Skip to content

Novation 164-01-11Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Novation (184)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862035097), received between Aug 18, 2020 and Feb 26, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K080980); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 26, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 42 YO PATIENT, WHO HAD THA¿S ON BOTH HIPS ON DIFFERENT DATES, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON THE LEFT HIP APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR 9 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THERE WAS NOTIFICATION OF WEAR AND TEAR AND COMPREHENSIVE FOLLOW-UP FOR PATIENTS TREATED SURGICALLY AND EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS WITH THE IMPLANTED MATERIALS. HOSPITALIZATION REQUIRED, NEED FOR INTERVENTION TO PREVENT INJURY OR PERMANENT DISABILITY, PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, SOCIAL, AND WORK-RELATED IMPACT WAS ALSO REPORTED. THE REPORT STATED THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT IN BOTH HIPS REMAINS IMPLANTED. NO DEVICE IMAGES OR X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24464409 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 135 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, SEVERE PAIN; SEVERE OSTEOLYSIS, EXCESSIVE SOFT TISSUE DEBRIS CONSISTENT WITH SYNOVITIS, GROSSLY LOOSE FEMORAL STEM, LOOSE CUP, EXCESSIVE POLYETHYLENE WEAR ON LINER WITH SIGNS OF OXIDATION / YELLOW DISCOLORATION, PITTING, CRACKING, AND DELAMINATION . REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE NOTES WERE PROVIDED. PATIENT LEFT THE OPERATING ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. POST OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS NOTED WEAR OF THE IMPLANT. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 20170301 ↗
  • InjuryJul 18, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    APPROXIMATELY 12 YEARS 7 MONTHS AFTER RIGHT PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT, THE PATIENT RETURNED COMPLAINING OF PAIN AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR LEFT PRIMARY HIP. THE POLY AND A RECALLED IMPLANT WERE WORN UPON EXAMINATION AND IMAGING. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION LEFT THA ON (B)(6) 2024 WHERE THE STEM, HEAD, AND LINER WERE REMOVED. A NEW LINER WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE CUP AND A DIFFERENT COMPANY (STRYKER) STEM AND THE HEAD WAS IMPLANTED INTO THE FEMORAL SIDE. THIS EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO THE BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE. THE EVENT DID NOT LEAD TO A SURGICAL PROLONGATION/DELAY. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. PRODUCT NOT RETURNING: IMPLANTS ARE SENT TO THE LAB AND LEGAL. NOT GIVEN TO THE REPRESENTATIVE. UNABLE TO OBTAIN IMAGES OF EXPLANTS OR X-RAYS. IMAGES & EBI ATTACHED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 19776382 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    APPROXIMATELY 4.5 YEARS POSTOP THE INITIAL THA, THIS FEMALE PATIENT HAD BEEN DISLOCATING THE RIGHT HIP AND THE SURGEON FELT THE STEM WAS TOO ANTEVERTED. THE LINER WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A HOODED LINER AND THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS EXCHANGED FOR A COMPETITOR¿S HEAD (MODULAR HEAD SYSTEM ALLOWING VERSION ADJUSTMENTS). PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. DEVICES WILL NOT RETURN DUE TO REP NOT PRESENT DUE TO COVID POLICY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 10419834 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K080980. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0201-2016 · Sep 23, 2015 · Terminated
    Novation Element Press-Fit, Cementless, HA Coated, Collared, Standard Offset, Size 9, Femoral Hip Implant Stems, Intended for press-fit fixation

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Non-Porous, Calicum-Phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page