Skip to content

Novation 186-01-58Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Novation (184)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862038807), received between Nov 2, 2021 and Sep 25, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 2 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Naturally Worn1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Osteolysis3
  • Pain3
  • Failure of Implant2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Balance Problems1
  • Cyst(s)1
  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 25, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    It was reported that the patient underwent an initial left total hip arthroplasty. Subsequently, it was reported that the patient experienced pain, osteolysis, prosthesis wear and acetabular loosening. As a result, the patient underwent a left hip revision approximately 7 years after initial implantation. Patient was last known to be in stable condition. No further information available.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 50897461 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY SEVEN YEARS POST INITIAL LEFT THA, THE 71 Y/O MALE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR PRIMARY EXACTECH HIP. THE PATIENT HAD A RECALL GXL POLY LINER AND WAS BOOKED FOR REVISION SURGERY. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT TOTAL ACETABULAR REVISION TO A EXACTECH 28MM COCR +10MM HEAD AND COMPETITOR'S DEVICES. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE. THERE WAS A 30-45 MINS SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. X-RAY AND IMAGES RECEIVED. THE DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION DUE TO THE PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE LAB AT THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 22456864 ↗
  • InjuryMay 27, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION AND THE SURGEON REMOVED THE HEAD AND THEN THE LINER, WHICH WAS IN PIECES. HE THEN IMPLANTED A NEW G3 XLE LINER AND A 40+7 BIOLOX OPTIONS HEAD. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA LEGAL NOTIFICATION NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD CATASTROPHIC FAILURE OF THEIR POLYETHYLENE WEAR. AFTER A THOROUGH HISTORY, PHYSICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION, THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A FAILED RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. DURING REVISION, COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF ANTERIOR HIP SCARRING WAS ENCOUNTERED. THE HIP WAS ASPIRATED. DARK GRAY/BLACK FLUID WAS OBTAINED, CONSISTENT WITH MELANOSIS. THIS WAS SENT TO THE LABORATORY. AN ANTERIOR HIP ARTHROTOMY WAS THEN PERFORMED IN THE USUAL FASHION. SOFT TISSUE DEBRIDEMENT WAS PERFORMED THROUGHOUT. COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF ADDITIONAL DARK GRAY/BLACK-APPEARING FLUID WAS OBTAINED AND THOROUGHLY DEBRIDED. IMMEDIATELY UPON ENTERING THE HIP JOINT THROUGH THE ANTERIOR HIP CAPSULE, FRAGMENTED POLYETHYLENE WAS READI

    Patient problems: Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 22090089 ↗
  • InjuryJan 29, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 55 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, PAIN, DISCOMFORT, CLICKING, SWELLING, GAIT IMPAIRMENT, POOR BALANCE, BONE LOSS, AND BONE DAMAGE. THE PATIENT ADDITIONALLY REPORTED EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. DURING THE PROCEDURE A LARGE OSTEOLYTIC CYST WAS FOUND, INCLUDING SYNOVITIS. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THE SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) IS CONFIRMED TO BE A PART OF RECALL NUMBER: Z-1729-2022 X-RAY: NO. OPERATIVE NOTES: NO.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Balance Problems; Cyst(s); Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Osteolysis; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 21265129 ↗
  • InjuryJan 24, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 15 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS LOOSENING AND PAIN. INITIAL SURGERY AND REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE NOTES WERE PROVIDED. PATIENT LEFT THE OPERATING ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 21230069 ↗
  • InjuryApr 19, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED POST-OP VIA CLINICAL STUDY THAT THE 46 YO MALE EXPERIENCED A LATE HEMATOGENOUS PROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION THAT POSSIBLY DEVELOPED FROM AN UPPER RESPIRATORY INFECTION, THAT SPREAD THROUGH THE BLOOD STREAM. THE EVENT RESULTED IN A TWO-STAGE REVISION, INCLUDING A TEMPORARY SPACER AND ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT FOLLOWED BY A SECOND REVISION TO A FINAL IMPLANT. THE OUTCOME WAS LAST KNOWN AS RESOLVED ON (B)(6)2021.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16770255 ↗
  • InjuryNov 2, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 14 MONTHS POSTOP THE INITIAL LTHA, THE (B)(6) MALE PATIENT HAD A REVISION OF AN EXACTECH HIP, LINER AND CUP, DUE TO PATIENT COMPLAINING OF PAIN AT SITE. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A ZIMMER TM CUP AND TRILOGY LINER. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. THE DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION, DUE TO FACILITY POLICY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 12741234 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page