Optetrak 200-05-29Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Optetrak (336)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862039859), received between Feb 12, 2025 and Apr 3, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (4 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
6 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K933610); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Apr 18, 2024Open, Classified
Exactech is recalling all affected UHMWPE (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene) knee patella components packaged in out of specification vacuum bags.
Z-2157-2024 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Naturally Worn4
- Lack of Effect1
Patient problems
- Loss of Range of Motion4
- Pain4
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Discomfort1
- Swelling/ Edema1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 3, 2026Naturally Worn; Lack of Effect
AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE SURGEON'S OFFICE WITH COMPLAINTS OF STIFFNESS FROM SWELLING, PAIN, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR TOTAL KNEE. DECREASED MOTION WAS PRESENT. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A REVISION OF THEIR RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, WITH A POSSIBLE POLYETHYLENE SWAP. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED AND UNDERWENT A TIBIAL POLY IMPLANT SWAP AND PATELLA IMPLANT SWAP. IMAGES PROVIDED SHOW WEAR OF THE TIBIAL INSERT AND PATELLA COMPONENTS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 24784287 ↗InjuryApr 17, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED A 63 YO MALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT TKA IN (B)(6) 2017, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2025, APPROXIMATELY 7 YEARS 11 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE SURGEON WITH COMPLAINTS OF STIFFNESS, PAIN, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT HAS A RECALLED POLY IMPLANT. THEY WERE SCHEDULED FOR A REVISION TKA, POSSIBLE POLY SWAP. THE PATIENT HAD REVISION SURGERY IN (B)(6) 2025 AND THE POLY IMPLANT AND PATELLA IMPLANT WERE SWAPPED. THERE WERE NO DEVICE BREAKAGES OR SURGICAL DELAYS DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THEY WERE SENT TO THE LAB AT THE HOSPITAL. DEVICE IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION. THIS IS 1 OF 2 REPORTS FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain
MAUDE report 21856360 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS PATIENT'S LEFT KNEE WAS REVISED 9 YEARS 3 MONTHS POST INITIAL OPERATION. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO SURGEON OFFICE WITH COMPLAINTS OF STIFFNESS, PAIN, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT HAS A RECALLED POLYETHYLENE IMPLANT. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A REVISION TKA POSSIBLE POLYETHYLENE SWAP. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TIBIAL POLYETHYLENE IMPLANT SWAP AND A PATELLA IMPLANT SWAP. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain
MAUDE report 21364735 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 63 YO MALE PATIENT, INITIAL LEFT TKA IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2017, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE IN (B)(6) 2025, APPROXIMATELY 7 YEARS 5 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAD RETURNED TO THE SURGEON¿S OFFICE WITH COMPLAINTS OF STIFFNESS, PAIN, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT HAS A RECALLED POLYETHYLENE IMPLANT. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A REVISION TKA POSSIBLE POLYETHYLENE SWAP. THE TIBIAL POLYETHYLENE IMPLANT AND A PATELLA IMPLANT WERE SWAPPED. THE POLYETHYLENE WAS BROKEN IN PIECES POSTERIORLY, THE PIECES OF THE IMPLANT AND POLYETHYLENE WERE REMOVED FROM THE WOUND SITE, AND THE KNEE JOINT WAS IRRIGATED WELL. THEY WERE REPLACED WITH A TIBIAL INSERT SZ 5, 10MM, AND A 3 PEG PATELLA CEMENTED 38 MM. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL DELAYS DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE. NO X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN AS THEY WERE SENT TO THE LAB AT THE HOSPITAL. DEVICE IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain
MAUDE report 21363750 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K933610. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2155-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedOPTETRAK Three Peg Patella, Item Numbers: a) 200-02-26, 26MM; b) 200-02-29, 29MM; c) 200-02-32, 32MM; d) 200-02-35, 35MM; e) 200-02-38, 38MM; f) 200-02-41, 41MM;
- Z-2156-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedOPTETRAK One Peg Patella,, Item Numbers: a) 200-03-26, 26MM; b) 200-03-29, 29MM; c) 200-03-32, 32MM; d) 200-03-35, 35MM; e) 200-03-38, 38MM; f) 200-03-41, 41MM
- Z-2158-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedOPTETRAK, Advanced Patella, 3 Peg Implant, Item Numbers: a) 200-07-26, 26MM; b) 200-07-29, 29MM; c) 200-07-32, 32MM; d) 200-07-35, 35MM; e) 200-07-38, 38MM
- Z-0582-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, ClassifiedExactech Optetrak Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 200-02-26, b) 200-02-29, c) 200-02-32, d) 200-02-35, e) 200-02-38, f) 200-02-41, g) 200-03-32, h) 200-07-29, i) 200-07-
- Z-2070-2012 · Sep 23, 2011 · TerminatedProduct is labeled in part: "***OPTETRAK***TIBIAL TRAY***TRAPEZOID CEMENTED***Ti Alloy*** SIZE 1F/1T, 2F/1T***FOR CEMENTED USE ONLY***Exactech, Gainesville, FL 32653-1630.***REF 2
- Z-0347-05 · Nov 11, 2004 · TerminatedCemented Trapezoid Tibial Tray Sz. 4F/4T, Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page