Skip to content

Optetrak 200-21-11Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862040152), received between Mar 27, 2024 and Jun 9, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K932776); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn2
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Fall1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Osteolysis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 9, 2026Naturally Worn

    REPORT #3 OF 3 FOR THIS EVENT. AS REPORTED BY LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. SUBSEQUENTLY, APPROXIMATELY TEN (10) YEARS LATER, THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO SURGEON COMPLAINING OF PAIN UNRELATED TO INJURY/WORK INJURY. PATIENT REPORTS 8 OUT OF 10 ON PAIN SCALE IN LEFT AND RIGHT KNEES. ONGOING INTERMITTENT ACHING. GRADUALLY WORSENING. AGGRAVATED BY: BENDING, STRETCHING, STRAIGHTENING, EXERCISE, KNEELING, SQUATTING, STANDING, WALKING, STAIRS. PATIENT REPORTED FALLING ON BOTH KNEES WHILE WALKING THE DOG. RADIOGRAPHS, PER THE SURGEON APPEARS TO DEMONSTRATE LUCENCY ABOUT THE TIBIAL PLATEAU COMPONENT OF THE PROSTHESIS AND FEMORAL COMPONENT OF THE PROSTHESIS ON THE LEFT THAT MAY REPRESENT LOOSENING. MEDICAL RECORDS AND CLINICAL HISTORY WERE PROVIDED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION OF THE LEFT KNEE OR IF A LEFT KNEE REVISION IS PLANNED OR SCHEDULED. THE PATIENT WAS REFERRED TO AN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEON FOR CONSULTATION OF POSSIBLE REVISION. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Fall; Pain

    MAUDE report 25450349 ↗
  • InjuryMar 27, 2024Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT HAD A TOTAL RIGHT KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2011 AND THEN APPROXIMATELY 12 YEARS, 11 MONTHS LATER ON (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT HAD A SURGICAL REVISION. REVISION OPERATIVE REPORT 8 JAN 2024-POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF RIGHT TOTAL KNEE. PATIENT REVISED TO COMPETITOR'S DEVICES. PATIENT WITH RADIOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS WITH AREAS OF OSTEOLYSIS IN FEMUR AND TIBIA. NEGATIVE FOR INFECTION. THERE IS EVIDENCE OF CATASTROPHIC POLYETHYLENE WEAR WITH VISUAL DETERIORATION OF THE POLYETHYLENE WITH MULTIPLE POLYETHYLENE FRAGMENTS THROUGHOUT THE KNEE. PATELLA POLYETHYLENE COMPONENT WAS UNDERMINED WITH AREAS OF OSTEOLYSIS. THE PATIENT WAS AWAKENED AND BROUGHT TO THE RECOVERY ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE IS NO OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 18985313 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K932776. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0927-06 · Dec 19, 2005 · Terminated
    Product is Optetrak Cemented Finned Tibial Tray Sz. 4F/5T. Knee prosthesis. Product is labeled in part: ''OPTETRAK FINNED TIBIAL TRAY A/P53 mm M/L 83mm***STERILE, SINGLE USE ONL
  • Z-1379-05 · Jun 2, 2005 · Terminated
    The product is a Finned Tibial Tray. Product is labeled in part: ''OPTETRAK FINNED TIBIAL TRAY A/P 53 mm ML 83mm***4F/5T Ti Alloy FITS ONLY SZ. 4 FEMORAL CEMENTED***STERILE, SING

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page