Skip to content

Optetrak 200-22-11Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862040206), received between Sep 1, 2022 and May 10, 2024 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (7 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K932776); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Open, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn7
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant4
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Depression1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 10, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 112 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS POLYETHYLENE WEAR AND PAIN. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Depression; Failure of Implant; Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 19292632 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    THIS 71 Y/O, FEMALE PATIENT UNDERWENT INITIAL TKA OF THE RIGHT KNEE ON (B)(6) 2015 AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH A CR INSERT TIBIAL SIZE 2, 11MM (CN: 200-22-11, SN: (B)(6). ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO UNKNOWN REASONS. DURING THE REVISION, CLEAR ASYMMETRY OF THE POLYETHYLENE CAUSED BY WEAR WAS NOTED. IT WAS DECIDED TO DO THE REVISION IN 2 STAGES. DURING THIS FIRST STAGE A CEMENT SPACER (ONLY) WAS PLACED. LATER ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THE SECOND STAGE OF THE REVISION. AT THIS TIME, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD SIGNIFICANT OSTEOLYSIS AND BONE LOSS IN THE TIBIA AND BOTH CONDYLES. THE SURGEON FELT THAT THIS WAS RELATED TO ASYMMETRICAL WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE INSERT. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A JOHNSON & JOHNSON SIGMA TKA SYSTEM WITH ¿SLEEVES".

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 18106961 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, A PATIENT HAD RIGHT KNEE REPLACEMENT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2010. THEY SUBSEQUENTLY UNDERWENT RIGHT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 12 YEARS 7 MONTHS POST PRIMARY PROCEDURE. REVISION OP REPORT STATES THAT "THERE WAS CLEAR EVIDENCE OF POLY WEAR AND DEBRIS" AND THAT "THE TIBIAL INSERT DEMONSTRATED EVIDENCE OF OXIDATION AND FAILURE." BOTH THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS WERE DETERMINED TO BE SATISFACTORILY FIXED. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 17712533 ↗
  • InjuryMay 24, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    DURING THE WEEK OF (B)(6), REPRESENTATIVES OF EXACTECH, INC. AND EXACTECH SPAIN CONDUCTED AN INPERSON SITE VISIT WITH (B)(6) HOSPITAL. AS A RESULT OF THAT SITE VISIT AND AT EXACTECH'S REQUEST, THE HOSPITAL PROVIDED A RETROSPECTIVE EXCEL LISTING OF REVISION RELATED TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR THAT HAVE BEEN PERFORMED SINCE 2010. THESE CASES HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED TO EXACTECH AS COMPLAINTS. THIS PATIENT (B)(6) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A 200-22-11-INSERTO TIB CR 2, 11MM, SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) ON (B)(6)2014. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 1/27/2014 AND WAS PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG WITH NO EVOH. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 1/27/2014 AND WAS 0.78 YEARS SHELF AGE AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION FOR WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16999698 ↗
  • InjuryMay 23, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    DURING THE WEEK OF (B)(6), REPRESENTATIVES OF EXACTECH, INC. AND EXACTECH SPAIN CONDUCTED AN INPERSON SITE VISIT WITH (B)(6) HOSPITAL. AS A RESULT OF THAT SITE VISIT AND AT EXACTECH'S REQUEST, THE HOSPITAL PROVIDED A RETROSPECTIVE EXCEL LISTING OF REVISION RELATED TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR THAT HAVE BEEN PERFORMED SINCE 2010. THESE CASES HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED TO EXACTECH AS COMPLAINTS. THIS PATIENT (B)(6) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A 200-22-11-INSERTO TIB CR 2, 11MM, SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) ON (B)(6)2014. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 2/25/2014 AND WAS PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG WITH NO EVOH. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 2/25/2014 AND WAS 0.40520191649555098 YEARS SHELF AGE AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT. PENDING REVISION FOR WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE. NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16989012 ↗
  • InjuryOct 5, 2022Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS FEMALE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED 10 YEARS POST OP DUE TO PREMATURE POLYETHYLENE WEAR OF THE TIBIAL INSERT. PATIENT HAD LOOSE COMPONENTS AND OSTEOLYSIS. FOLLOWING THE REVISION SURGERY, PLAINTIFF CONTINUES TO BE LIMITED IN HER ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING. DESPITE UNDERGOING REVISION SURGERY, PLAINTIFF EXPERIENCES DAILY PAIN AND DISCOMFORT IN HER RIGHT KNEE WHICH LIMITS HER ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING AND IMPACTS HER QUALITY OF LIFE. NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 15545512 ↗
  • InjurySep 1, 2022Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED BY LEGAL, THAT THIS PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS IMPLANTED (B)(6) 2009. REVISION DATE: (B)(6) 2015; REASON FOR THE REVISION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15334331 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K932776. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0927-06 · Dec 19, 2005 · Terminated
    Product is Optetrak Cemented Finned Tibial Tray Sz. 4F/5T. Knee prosthesis. Product is labeled in part: ''OPTETRAK FINNED TIBIAL TRAY A/P53 mm M/L 83mm***STERILE, SINGLE USE ONL
  • Z-1379-05 · Jun 2, 2005 · Terminated
    The product is a Finned Tibial Tray. Product is labeled in part: ''OPTETRAK FINNED TIBIAL TRAY A/P 53 mm ML 83mm***4F/5T Ti Alloy FITS ONLY SZ. 4 FEMORAL CEMENTED***STERILE, SING

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page