Skip to content

Optetrak 200-22-15Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862040220), received between Nov 14, 2022 and Oct 30, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K932776); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Open, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Naturally Worn1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Implant Pain1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 30, 2024Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 12 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST INITIAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT (TKA), THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE DOCTOR OFFICE COMPLAINING ABOUT THEIR TKA WITH REPORTS OF PAIN, INSTABILITY, AND DISSATISFACTION. THE PATIENT HAD A RECALLED TIBIAL POLY INSERT. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A LEFT FULL KNEE REVISION VS POLY SWAP. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT KNEE REVISION, A FEMORAL COMPONENT REVISION AND A POLY REVISION WAS PERFORMED DUE TO INSTABILITY OF THE KNEE EVEN AT THE THICKEST CRC POLY 19MM. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO FEMORAL PS- CC REVISION COMPONENT AND PSC POLY IMPLANT. THE SURGEON WANTED TO UPSIZE THE FEMUR COMPONENT FOR SIZING AND TO CLOSE THE FLEXION GAP KNOWING IT IS OFF LABEL IF KEEPING THE CURRENT TIBIA IMPLANT SIZE. THE TIBIA COMPONENT WAS WELL FIXED, AND THE SURGEON TRAILED A PSC POLY IMPLANT FOR THAT SIZE TIBIA. THE SURGERY WAS PROLONGED APPROXIMATELY 15-30 MINUTES. THE SURGEON WAS HAPPY WITH THE ARTICULATION AND STABILITY. THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH THE REVISION FEMORAL COMPONENT AND NEW PSC POLY. THE PATIENT LEFT THE OR STABLE AND WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain

    MAUDE report 20568085 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A FEMALE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE IMPLANTED IN 2002, AND WAS REVISED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE PATIENT WAS HAVING PAIN, SO THE DOCTOR TOOK OUT THE OPTETRAK CR SIZE 2 15 MM POLY AND PUT IN A TRULIANT CR SIZE 2 17MM POLY. THE ONLY INFORMATION THE REPRESENTATIVE IS ABLE TO PROVIDE IS THAT THE CASE WAS IN 2022 AND THAT THERE IS NO SERIAL NUMBERS FOR THE DEVICES AVAILABLE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ISSUES DURING THE SURGICAL REVISION PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN, THE HOSPITAL KEPT IT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Pain

    MAUDE report 15789813 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K932776. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0927-06 · Dec 19, 2005 · Terminated
    Product is Optetrak Cemented Finned Tibial Tray Sz. 4F/5T. Knee prosthesis. Product is labeled in part: ''OPTETRAK FINNED TIBIAL TRAY A/P53 mm M/L 83mm***STERILE, SINGLE USE ONL
  • Z-1379-05 · Jun 2, 2005 · Terminated
    The product is a Finned Tibial Tray. Product is labeled in part: ''OPTETRAK FINNED TIBIAL TRAY A/P 53 mm ML 83mm***4F/5T Ti Alloy FITS ONLY SZ. 4 FEMORAL CEMENTED***STERILE, SING

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page