Skip to content

Optetrak 200-64-09Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862041104), received between Jul 9, 2021 and Sep 3, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (5 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

5 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K932690); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant3
  • Osteolysis3
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Cyst(s)1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Joint effusion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 3, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    "LEGAL CASE ¿ USA (MDL NO. (B)(4)) PATIENT ID: + RIGHT KNEE IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 137 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAS EXPERIENCED PROSTHESIS WEAR, OSTEOLYSIS, PAIN, SYNOVIAL, EFFUSION AND INSTABILITY. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Implant Pain; Joint Laxity; Joint effusion; Osteolysis; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 20125073 ↗
  • InjuryJun 15, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, THIS PATIENT HAD LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6)2008. THEY HAD LEFT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023, APPROXIMATELY 15 YEARS AFTER THEIR INITIAL IMPLANTATION. PREOPERATIVELY THERE WERE SIGNS OF SOME OSTEOLYSIS AROUND THE IMPLANT BUT NO CLEAR SIGN THAT THE IMPLANT WAS LOOSE. HOWEVER, THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT NARROWING ON THE MEDIAL SIDE OF THE IMPLANT SUGGESTING EXCESSIVE POLYETHYLENE WEAR. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: POLYETHYLENE WEAR OF LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT WITH ASEPTIC TIBIAL LOOSENING. PATELLA COMPONENT SHOWED SOME WEAR BUT WAS NOT EXTENSIVE. THE PATELLA BUTTON SEEMED TO BE WELL FIXED AND WAS LEFT AS IS. THE POLYETHYLENE HAD WORN THROUGH COMPLETELY IN THE POSTERIOR MEDIAL CORNER AND HAD DISRUPTED THE LOCKING MECHANISM ON THE POLYETHYLENE. THE FEMORAL COMPONENT APPEARED TO BE FIXED, BUT THE TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS LOOSE, AS IT HAD SOME MOTION. THERE WAS MOTION UNDERNEATH THE TRAY AND FLUID MOVING IN AND OUT ON THE MEDIAL SIDE. THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF A OSTEOLYTIC CYST ON THE LEFT MEDIAL FEMORAL CONDYLE BUT WAS CONTAINED. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OT

    Patient problems: Cyst(s); Failure of Implant; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 17136506 ↗
  • InjuryMay 24, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    DURING THE WEEK OF APRIL (B)(6), REPRESENTATIVES OF EXACTECH, INC. AND EXACTECH SPAIN CONDUCTED AN INPERSON SITE VISIT WITH (B)(6) HOSPITAL. AS A RESULT OF THAT SITE VISIT AND AT EXACTECH'S REQUEST, THE HOSPITAL PROVIDED A RETROSPECTIVE EXCEL LISTING OF REVISION RELATED TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR THAT HAVE BEEN PERFORMED SINCE 2010. THESE CASES HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED TO EXACTECH AS COMPLAINTS. THIS PATIENT (B)(6) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A 200-64-09-INSERTO TIBIAL SLOPE+ CR 4-9 MM, SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2014. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 8/3/2010 AND WAS PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG WITH NO EVOH. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 8/3/2010 AND WAS 3 YEARS 5 MONTHS SHELF AGE AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT. ON 0/0/21, APPROXIMATELY 7.0 YEARS POST IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION FOR WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE. NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16998955 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2022Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, THIS 61 YEAR OLD MALE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT TKA ON (B)(6) 2014. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO POLY WEAR. THERE IS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED. INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15963695 ↗
  • InjuryJul 14, 2021Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN AND INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON NOTED THERE WAS SEVERE DAMAGE TO THE POLY AND THERE WERE NOTICEABLE DAMAGE ON THE TIBIAL TRAY. THE SURGEON HAD TO REVISE THIS TO A HINGE KNEE. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 12170656 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 7.5 YRS POSTOP THE INITIAL IMPLANT, THE MALE PATIENT WAS REVISED FOUND CATASTROPHIC POLY FAILURE WITH MASSIVE OSTEOLYSIS OF THE RIGHT KNEE. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 12143668 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K932690. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2156-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, Classified
    OPTETRAK One Peg Patella,, Item Numbers: a) 200-03-26, 26MM; b) 200-03-29, 29MM; c) 200-03-32, 32MM; d) 200-03-35, 35MM; e) 200-03-38, 38MM; f) 200-03-41, 41MM
  • Z-2155-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, Classified
    OPTETRAK Three Peg Patella, Item Numbers: a) 200-02-26, 26MM; b) 200-02-29, 29MM; c) 200-02-32, 32MM; d) 200-02-35, 35MM; e) 200-02-38, 38MM; f) 200-02-41, 41MM;
  • Z-2157-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, Classified
    OPTETRAK Inset Patella, Item Numbers: a) 200-05-23, 23MM; b) 200-05-26, 26MM; c) 200-05-29, 29MM
  • Z-2158-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, Classified
    OPTETRAK, Advanced Patella, 3 Peg Implant, Item Numbers: a) 200-07-26, 26MM; b) 200-07-29, 29MM; c) 200-07-32, 32MM; d) 200-07-35, 35MM; e) 200-07-38, 38MM
  • Z-0582-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Optetrak Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 200-02-26, b) 200-02-29, c) 200-02-32, d) 200-02-35, e) 200-02-38, f) 200-02-41, g) 200-03-32, h) 200-07-29, i) 200-07-

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page