Optetrak 200-65-09Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Optetrak (336)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862041135), received between Aug 30, 2022 and Apr 17, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (3 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
5 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K932690); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 30, 2021Open, Classified
Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.
Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Naturally Worn3
- Unstable2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Scar Tissue3
- Failure of Implant2
- Joint Laxity2
- Osteolysis2
- Pain2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Inflammation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 17, 2024Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6)2012. APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2017. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. SERIAL RADIOGRAPHS AND BONE SCAN DEMONSTRATE INCREASED UPTAKE IN THE DISTAL FEMUR AND TIBIA WITH WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE COMPONENT. SURVEILLANCE LABS WITH CBC, ESR AND CRP WERE WITHIN NORMAL LIMITS. RIGHT TKA ASEPTIC LOOSENING WITH EXTENSIVE METALLOSIS. ¿THERE WAS EXTENSIVE METALLOSIS WITHIN THE KNEE JOINT. THERE WAS NO GROSS PURULENCE..¿ THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO RECOVERY IN STABLE CONDITION. REVISION RIGHT TKA. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO COMPETITOR'S DEVICES. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Joint Laxity; Metal Related Pathology; Osteolysis; Pain; Scar Tissue; Synovitis
MAUDE report 19126467 ↗InjuryNov 30, 2023Fracture; Naturally Worn; Fracture; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2012. APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2019. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. REVISION OP REPORT ON (B)(6) 2019: DIAGNOSIS: FAILED LEFT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR "BOTH IMPLANTS CAME OUT RATHER EASILY BUT I WOULD NOT SAY THERE IS ANY GROSS ASEPTIC LOOSENING OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT THERE WAS SOME SUBSIDENCE OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT. ALSO WAS NOTED THAT BOTH POSTERIOR ASPECTS OF THE TIBIAL POLYETHYLENE WEAR FRACTURED IN BROKEN MULTIPLE AREAS AND MULTIPLE SMALL PIECES OF POLYETHYLENE WERE FLOATING ABOUT THE KNEE. HE HAD QUITE A ROBUST AMOUNT OF SYNOVITIS THAT AGAIN I DEBRIDED AND SENT FOR EVALUATION. I ALSO NOTED A VERY LARGE AMOUNT OF POLYETHYLENE WEAR OF THE PATELLA. PATIENT WAS TAKEN THE PACU IN STABLE CONDITION."
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Osteolysis; Scar Tissue
MAUDE report 18238973 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2022Unstable; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED, THIS PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL TKA ON (B)(6) 2010. THE PATIENT FEELS THAT HE HAS HAD COMPLICATIONS AND ISSUES RELATED TO HIS KNEE. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED IN (B)(6) 2021.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Failure of Implant; Inflammation; Insufficient Information; Joint Laxity; Joint effusion; Pain; Scar Tissue; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 15319683 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K932690. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2156-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedOPTETRAK One Peg Patella,, Item Numbers: a) 200-03-26, 26MM; b) 200-03-29, 29MM; c) 200-03-32, 32MM; d) 200-03-35, 35MM; e) 200-03-38, 38MM; f) 200-03-41, 41MM
- Z-2158-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedOPTETRAK, Advanced Patella, 3 Peg Implant, Item Numbers: a) 200-07-26, 26MM; b) 200-07-29, 29MM; c) 200-07-32, 32MM; d) 200-07-35, 35MM; e) 200-07-38, 38MM
- Z-2155-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedOPTETRAK Three Peg Patella, Item Numbers: a) 200-02-26, 26MM; b) 200-02-29, 29MM; c) 200-02-32, 32MM; d) 200-02-35, 35MM; e) 200-02-38, 38MM; f) 200-02-41, 41MM;
- Z-2157-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedOPTETRAK Inset Patella, Item Numbers: a) 200-05-23, 23MM; b) 200-05-26, 26MM; c) 200-05-29, 29MM
- Z-0582-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, ClassifiedExactech Optetrak Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 200-02-26, b) 200-02-29, c) 200-02-32, d) 200-02-35, e) 200-02-38, f) 200-02-41, g) 200-03-32, h) 200-07-29, i) 200-07-
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page