Skip to content

Optetrak 204-16-13Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10885862048110), received between Jul 11, 2023 and Jul 11, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K933494); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Open, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 11, 2023Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, A PATIENT HAD RIGHT KNEE REPLACEMENT SURGERY ON (B)(6)2011 DUE TO DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE. THEY SUBSEQUENTLY UNDERWENT RIGHT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6)2022, APPROXIMATELY 11 YEARS 2 MONTHS AFTER THEIR PRECEDING SURGERY. (B)(6)2022 OP REPORT STATES THAT THERE WAS NO PURULENCE OR INFLAMMATION NOTED UPON EXPOSURE OF THE KNEE JOINT THOUGH THERE WAS EXTENSIVE POLY WEAR WITH ASSOCIATED SYNOVIAL CHANGES. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT THE TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS WERE WELL FIXED BUT EASILY SEPARATED FROM THE BONE CEMENT INTERFACE. DUE TO POLY WEAR, THE PATELLA WAS ALSO REPLACED. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 17300168 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K933494. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0522-2007 · Dec 7, 2006 · Terminated
    Polyethylene tibial posterior stabilized components. Optetrak All Poly Tibial PS Component. Knee prosthesis. Catalog number : 204-11-13

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page