Optetrak 208-23-09Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Optetrak (336)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 8
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862054241), received between Oct 30, 2020 and May 16, 2025 — classified as 8 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (6 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K954208); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified
Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.
Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Naturally Worn6
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Unstable2
- Fracture1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Mechanical Problem1
Patient problems
- Synovitis5
- Failure of Implant4
- Osteolysis4
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
- Joint Laxity2
- Joint effusion2
- Swelling/ Edema2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 16, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A INITIAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. FIVE YEARS LATER, SWELLING AND MILD POLYETHYLENE ASYMMETRY WERE OBSERVED ON RADIOGRAPHS. THREE YEARS AFTER THAT, TIBIAL OSTEOLYSIS WAS DETECTED AND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. NO RELEVANT MEDICAL HISTORY PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 22035865 ↗InjuryMar 22, 2024Fracture; Naturally Worn; Fracture; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT HAD A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2012, AND THEN EXPERIENCED REVISION SURGICAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023 APPROXIMATELY 11 YEARS AND 1 MONTH AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT. NO IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. THERE IS NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Joint effusion; Metal Related Pathology; Synovitis
MAUDE report 18956971 ↗InjurySep 12, 2023Mechanical Problem; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Mechanical Problem; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 162 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, INSTABILITY, JOINT LAXITY, LOSS OF RANGE OF MOTION, OSTEOLYSIS, AND SYNOVITIS. REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE NOTES WERE PROVIDED. PATIENT LEFT THE OPERATING ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Joint effusion; Loss of Range of Motion; Osteolysis; Synovitis
MAUDE report 17728297 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DEPARTMENT A FEMALE PATIENT HAD A BILATERAL KNEES ON (B)(6) 2007. APPROXIMATELY 15 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD BILATERAL KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. REVISION OP REPORT ON (B)(6) 2022: POSTOP DIAGNOSIS: POLYETHYLENE PARTICULATE DEBRIS-INDUCED SYNOVITIS BILATERAL KNEES STATUS POST BILATERAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT IN 2007. FINDINGS: ON THE RIGHT KNEE THERE WAS A MODERATE DEGREE OF SYNOVITIS. FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS WERE WELL FIXED. THE PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS NOT LOOSE BUT THERE WAS WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE. THERE WAS WEAR ON THE ANTERIOR ASPECT OF THE POST FOR THE CPK LINER. A COMPRESSIVE STERILE DRESSING WAS THEN APPLIED TO THE KNEE AND THE PATIENT BROUGHT TO RECOVERY IN STABLE CONDITION.
Patient problems: Synovitis
MAUDE report 17198772 ↗InjuryNov 2, 2022Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED VIA A LEGAL NOTIFICATION, THAT A 71 YO MALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2009 WITH POLYETHYLENE TIBIAL LINING MANUFACTURED BY EXACTECH, INC, SUFFERED PERSONAL INJURIES FROM THAT SURGERY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BONE LOSS AND THE NEED FOR FURTHER SURGERY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Aseptic loosening; Cyst(s); Failure of Implant; Osteolysis; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis
MAUDE report 15718528 ↗InjurySep 1, 2022Unstable; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED BY LEGAL, THAT A PATIENT HAD A RIGHT KNEE OPTETRAK IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2017 WITH REVISION DATE: (B)(6) 2022. REASON FOR THE REVISION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Discomfort; Emotional Changes; Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Insufficient Information; Joint Laxity; Osteolysis; Synovitis
MAUDE report 15334499 ↗InjuryMay 6, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED, PATIENT RETURNED TO HSS 20 YEARS AFTER A TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT COMPLAINING OF PAIN AND INSTABILITY. THE FEMUR AND TIBIA SEEMED TO BE WELL FIXED SO THE INSERT WAS REMOVED AND A 15MM CCK INSERT WAS IMPLANTED. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION DUE TO HOSPITAL RETAINS ALL RETRIEVALS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 11783804 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A LEFT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2012, DUE TO INFECTION. INITIAL SURGERY DATE WAS (B)(6) 2008. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE EVENT OR PATIENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10760150 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K954208. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0582-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, ClassifiedExactech Optetrak Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 200-02-26, b) 200-02-29, c) 200-02-32, d) 200-02-35, e) 200-02-38, f) 200-02-41, g) 200-03-32, h) 200-07-29, i) 200-07-
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page