Skip to content

Optetrak 208-23-13Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862054265), received between Mar 12, 2021 and Nov 12, 2024 — classified as 10 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (9 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K954208); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Open, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn9
  • Unstable3
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Osteolysis5
  • Failure of Implant3
  • Implant Pain3
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties2
  • Discomfort2
  • Joint Laxity2
  • Pain2

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 12, 2024Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 56 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20665679 ↗
  • InjuryNov 5, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 187 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAS EXPERIENCED PROSTHESIS WEAR. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20615014 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2024Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 133 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, SYNOVITIS & OSTEOLYSIS. POST OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS NOTED WEAR OF THE IMPLANT. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Osteolysis; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 20171802 ↗
  • InjurySep 5, 2024Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn

    LEGAL CASE - USA. PATIENT ID: (B)(6). SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) IS CONFIRMED TO HAVE BEEN PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG THAT DOES NOT CONTAIN EVOH. IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 50 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAS EXPERIENCED PROSTHESIS WEAR, OSTEOLYSIS, SYNOVITIS. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. UDI: (B)(4). 510K: K954208.

    Patient problems: Cyst(s); Implant Pain; Joint Laxity; Osteolysis; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 20144941 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2024Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 156 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR ACCELERATED AND PREVENTABLE WEAR OF THE OPTETRAK LOGIC POLYETHYLENE TIBIAL INSERT. PATIENT HAS SUFFERED AND CONTINUES TO SUFFER PERMANENT AND DEBILITATING INJURIES AND DAMAGES, PAIN, DISCOMFORT, GAIT IMPAIRMENT, POOR BALANCE, DIFFICULTY WALKING; COMPONENT PART LOOSENING, SOFT TISSUE DAMAGE, BONE LOSS AND OTHER INJURIES PRESENTLY UNDIAGNOSED WHICH WILL ALL REQUIRE ONGOING MEDICAL CARE. . POST OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS NOTED WEAR OF THE IMPLANT. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE."

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Balance Problems; Discomfort; Implant Pain; Joint Laxity; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 19615572 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2023Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY ELEVEN YEARS POST INITIAL TKA, PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND BAD OSTEOLYSIS. THERE WAS NO ISSUES REMOVING COMPONENTS. COMPETITOR'S REVISION KNEE WAS IMPLANTED. THE EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 17201743 ↗
  • InjuryMay 21, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    DURING THE WEEK OF APRIL 17-25, REPRESENTATIVES OF EXACTECH, INC. AND EXACTECH SPAIN CONDUCTED AN IN PERSON SITE VISIT WITH (B)(6) HOSPITAL. AS A RESULT OF THAT SITE VISIT AND AT EXACTECH'S REQUEST, THE HOSPITAL PROVIDED A RETROSPECTIVE EXCEL LISTING OF REVISION RELATED TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR THAT HAVE BEEN PERFORMED SINCE 2010. THESE CASES HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED TO EXACTECH AS COMPLAINTS. THIS PATIENT (B)(6) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A 208-23-13-INSERTO TIBIAL CC 3,13MM, SERIAL NUMBER: (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2019. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 5-JUL-2016 AND WAS PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG WITH NO EVOH. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 5-JUL-2016 AND WAS 3 YEARS SHELF AGE AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT. APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS POST IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION FOR WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE. NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16971078 ↗
  • InjuryMay 5, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION A FEMALE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2011. APPROXIMATELY 11 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT KNEE REVISION DUE TO PROSTHESIS WEAR. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. OP REPORT (B)(6) 2023/ K MCGUINNESS RECEIVED VIA LEGAL (B)(6) 2023. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: FAILED RIGHT KNEE DUE TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR. FINDINGS: PARTIAL LOOSE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE AMOUNT OF OSTEOLYSIS BEHIND THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND AROUND THE TIBIAL COMPONENT. THE PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS WELL FIXED BUT ALSO HAD A MODERATE AMOUNT OF POLYETHYLENE WEAR. AN ACE WRAP FROM TOE TO THIGH WAS APPLIED. THE PATIENT WAS AWAKENED AND TRANSFERRED TO RECOVERY IN STABLE CONDITIONS WITH NO COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Discomfort; Failure of Implant; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 16876222 ↗
  • InjuryMar 22, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT 58 YO MALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2021, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023, APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS 1 MONTH POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE DUE TO POLY WEAR. THE INSERT WAS REPLACED. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL DELAYS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN AS IT WAS DISPOSED OF BY THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16591531 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2021Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 8 YRS POSTOP THE INITIAL IMPLANT, THE RIGHT CCK LINER WAS REPLACED BY A NEW CCK IMPLANT IN THIS THIS MALE PATIENT. SURGEON SUSPECTED THAT IT IS THE BACKING OF THE STUFFING SCREW CAUSED THE COMPONENTS TO SEPARATE DURING RANGE OF MOTION AND RESULT IN INSTABILITY. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. THE DEVICE IS NOT RETURNING FOR EVALUATION DUE TO HOSPITAL DISPOSED THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11474822 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K954208. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0582-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Optetrak Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 200-02-26, b) 200-02-29, c) 200-02-32, d) 200-02-35, e) 200-02-38, f) 200-02-41, g) 200-03-32, h) 200-07-29, i) 200-07-

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page