Skip to content

Optetrak 208-24-11Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862054333), received between Feb 4, 2022 and Sep 16, 2024 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (5 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K954208); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn5
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Unstable2

Patient problems

  • Pain4
  • Osteolysis3
  • Swelling/ Edema3
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties2
  • Discomfort2
  • Erosion2
  • Failure of Implant2
  • Insufficient Information2

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 16, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 58 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20226230 ↗
  • InjurySep 16, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 144 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, PAIN, SWELLING, EFFUSION, CYST AND OSTEOLYSIS. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Cyst(s); Joint effusion; Osteolysis; Pain; Scar Tissue; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 20225734 ↗
  • InjuryJul 21, 2023Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, A PATIENT HAD RIGHT KNEE REPLACEMENT SURGERY ON (B)(6)2014. THEY UNDERWENT RIGHT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6)2022, APPROXIMATELY 8 YEARS POST PRIMARY PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAS CLAIMS TO HAVE SUFFERED GRIEVOUS PAIN. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE OR PATIENT OUTCOME. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 17372157 ↗
  • InjuryApr 25, 2023Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, ON (B)(6) 2008, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT RIGHT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT SURGERY AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN OPTETRAK CC POLYETHYLENE TIBIAL INSERT. PATIENT EXPERIENCES PAIN IN HIS RIGHT KNEE AND MAY REQUIRE A RIGHT KNEE REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE THE REMAINING RECALLED LINER AT A LATER TIME. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON A SURGICAL PROCEDURE OR PATIENT OUTCOME. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Discomfort; Erosion; Joint Laxity; Osteolysis; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Musculoskeletal problem

    MAUDE report 16810385 ↗
  • InjuryOct 12, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 1.5 YEARS POST PATIENT'S REVISION, THE MALE PATIENT HAD A SECOND REVISION FOR POLY SWAP. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15588468 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2022Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED, A PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT SYSTEM ON 2 AUG 2010 AND WAS REVISED ON 6 MAY 2019. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Balance Problems; Discomfort; Erosion; Failure of Implant; Joint Laxity; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 15481976 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 4, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 11.60 YEARS SINCE INITIAL IMPLANT, THIS MALE PATIENT WITH BMI 23.8 UNDERWENT A LEFT SIDE TKA AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN EXACTECH UHMWPE INSERT, SERIAL # (B)(4). ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO OSTEOLYSIS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE OR FORTHCOMING.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 13451401 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K954208. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0582-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Optetrak Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 200-02-26, b) 200-02-29, c) 200-02-32, d) 200-02-35, e) 200-02-38, f) 200-02-41, g) 200-03-32, h) 200-07-29, i) 200-07-

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page