Optetrak 208-51-09Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862054487), received between May 24, 2023 and May 25, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

1. Aug 30, 2021Open, Classified

   Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

   Z-0019-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryMay 25, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  DURING THE WEEK OF APRIL 17-25, REPRESENTATIVES OF EXACTECH, INC. AND EXACTECH SPAIN CONDUCTED AN INPERSON SITE VISIT WITH (B)(6) HOSPITAL. AS A RESULT OF THAT SITE VISIT AND AT EXACTECH'S REQUEST, THE HOSPITAL PROVIDED A RETROSPECTIVE EXCEL LISTING OF REVISION RELATED TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR THAT HAVE BEEN PERFORMED SINCE 2010. THESE CASES HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED TO EXACTECH AS COMPLAINTS. THIS PATIENT (B)(6)) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A 208-51-09-INSERTO TIBIAL CC 1 DELTA, 9MM, SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2013. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 2/7/2012 AND WAS PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG WITH NO EVOH. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 2/7/2012 AND WAS 1.30 YEARS SHELF AGE AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT. ON (B)(6) 2017, APPROXIMATELY 4.0 YEARS POST IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION FOR WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE. NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

  Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 17001263 ↗
• InjuryMay 24, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  DURING THE WEEK OF APRIL (B)(6), REPRESENTATIVES OF EXACTECH, INC. AND EXACTECH SPAIN CONDUCTED AN INPERSONSITE VISIT WITH (B)(6) HOSPITAL. AS A RESULT OF THAT SITE VISIT AND AT EXACTECH'S REQUEST, THE HOSPITAL PROVIDED A RETROSPECTIVE EXCEL LISTING OF REVISION RELATED TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR THAT HAVE BEEN PERFORMED SINCE 2010. THESE CASES HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPORTED TO EXACTECH AS COMPLAINTS.THIS PATIENT (B)(6) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A 208-51-09-INSERTO TIBIAL CC 1 DELTA, 9MM, SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) ON (B)(6)2014. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 2/7/2012 AND WAS PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG WITH NO EVOH. THE INSERT WAS MANUFACTURED ON 2/7/2012 AND WAS 2 YEARS 8 MONTHS SHELF AGE AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT.ON (B)(6)2021, APPROXIMATELY 7.0 YEARS POST IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION FOR WEAR OF THEPOLYETHYLENE. NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 16998334 ↗