Skip to content

Optetrak 234-02-03Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862063199), received between Feb 12, 2020 and Aug 13, 2024 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Naturally Worn1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant5
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
  • Joint Laxity2
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 13, 2024Unstable; Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 134 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, GROOVING AND DELAMINATION OF THE PATELLA RESULTING IN A GROSSLY LOOSE TIBIAL COMPONENT AS WELL AS LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information; Joint Laxity; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 19974155 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 109 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, BONE LOSS, LOOSENING OF TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS. POST OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS NOTED WEAR OF THE IMPLANT. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Failure of Implant; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 19523835 ↗
  • InjuryDec 23, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED BY THE EXACTECH KNEE REPLACEMENT STUDY, APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS POST TKA, THE (B)(6) FEMALE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN AND FUNCTIONAL LIMITATION OF THE LEFT KNEE WITH INFLAMMATORY CHANGES IN SURGICAL WOUND, RADIOGRAPHY EVIDENCE LOOSENING OF TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENT, ORDERS ARE GIVEN IN FIRST TIME WITH SPACER AND CULTURE TAKING. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFORMATION FOUND REGARDING TREATMENT OR A REVISION. THE EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE DEVICE AND TO THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 13081981 ↗
  • InjuryOct 30, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A LEFT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2012, DUE TO OSTEOLYSIS. INITIAL SURGERY DATE WAS (B)(6) 2011. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE EVENT OR PATIENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 10760054 ↗
  • InjuryOct 19, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A LEFT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2010, DUE TO INFECTION. INITIAL SURGERY DATE WAS (B)(6) 2008. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE EVENT OR PATIENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10702462 ↗
  • InjuryOct 12, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A LEFT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2008, DUE TO INFECTION. INITIAL SURGERY DATE WAS (B)(6) 2008. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE EVENT OR PATIENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10661608 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    INITIAL IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2014. LEFT KNEE REVISION DATE: (B)(6) 2019, HOSPITAL: UNKNOWN, SURGEON: UNKNOWN AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS POSTOP THE INITIAL IMPLANT, A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A LEFT KNEE DEVICE FAILURE AND WAS DEFECTIVE BECAUSE OF ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS, SUBSTANTIAL AND DEFECTIVE POLYETHYLENE WEAR, INCLUDING PARTICULATE DEBRIS OF THE PLASTIC POLYETHYLENE INSERT FOUND THROUGHOUT THE KNEE AREA, POLYETHYLENE WEAR RESULTING IN LOOSENING OF THE DEVICE AROUND THE WORN POLYETHYLENE INSERT AREA. NO OTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10013699 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED BY THE EXACTECH KNEE REPLACEMENT STUDY, THE (B)(6) Y/O FEMALE PATIENT WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN LEFT ASEPTIC TIBIAL LOOSENING. PATIENT WEIGHS (B)(6) LBS. PATIENT WITH CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL SIGNS COMPATIBLE WITH ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL COMPONENT, IS TAKEN TO REVIEW THE TIBIAL COMPONENT OF LEFT RTR, ON (B)(6) 2020, THE FEMORAL COMPONENT IS STABLE IS NOT REVIEWED, PROCEDURE WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS, DISCHARGED ON (B)(6) 2020. THE EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO THE DEVICE BUT POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. DEVICES NOT RETURNING. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION RECEIVED AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9700049 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page