Skip to content

Optetrak 234-03-03Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak (336)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862063267), received between Feb 12, 2020 and Nov 24, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Osteolysis3
  • Joint Laxity2
  • Pain2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Bacterial Infection1
  • Balance Problems1
  • Discomfort1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 24, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED POLYETHYLENE WEAR AND PAIN. AS A RESULT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT KNEE REVISION APPROXIMATELY 16 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANTATION. IT WAS LATER OBSERVED THAT THE PATIENT'S FEMORAL COMPONENT HAD DEBONDED. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 23630916 ↗
  • InjuryJul 30, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT, WHO HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A SYNOVECTOMY SURROUNDING THE AFFECTED KNEE. SEVERE OSTEOLYSIS PRESENT. SEVERE DAMAGE TO THE TIBIAL INSERT. UPON FURTHER INSPECTION, THE FEMORAL COMPONENT HAD LOOSENED. ALL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND REVISED TO ANOTHER SYSTEM. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL DELAYS OR DEVICE BREAKAGES REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO X-RAYS WERE ABLE TO BE OBTAINED. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THE HOSPITAL RETAINED THEM FOR ANALYSIS. DEVICE IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 22661222 ↗
  • InjuryJul 22, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 130 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, FAILURE OF LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT SECONDARY TO POLYETHYLENE LINER RESULTING IN BONE LOSS AND A LOOSE TIBIAL COMPONENT AS WELL LOOSENING OF TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS. A LWEAR AND BREAKING OF THE POLYETHYLENE LINER, OSTEOLYSIS, . POST OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS NOTED WEAR OF THE IMPLANT. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 19794373 ↗
  • InjurySep 29, 2022Patient Device Interaction Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT TKA ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2016 DUE TO DEGENERATIVE ARTHRITIS. AFTER, THE PATIENT PRESENTED FOR AN EVALUATION OF HIS RIGHT KNEE AS HE HAD BEEN COMPLAINING OF MECHANICAL COMPLICATIONS AND CHRONIC PAIN. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT HAD REVISION SURGERY DUE TO IMPLANT LOOSENING OSTEOLYSIS AND SIGNIFICANT SYNOVITIS. THE SURGEON NOTED THAT THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS COMPLETELY LOOSE AND REMOVED BY HAND AND THAT THE PATELLAR AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS WERE ALSO LOOSE AND VERY EASILY EXTRACTED. THE INSERT WAS NOTED TO BE CRACKED AND FISSURED.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Balance Problems; Discomfort; Failure of Implant; Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 15502020 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, THE (B)(6) Y/O FEMALE PATIENT WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016 BY THE EXACTECH KNEE REPLACEMENT STUDY. THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF AN INFECTION. PATIENT COURSE WITH PAIN AND FINDINGS OF RADIOGRAPHIC LOOSENING IS SCHEDULED FOR REVISION ON (B)(6) 2019, AND IS PERFORMED WITH PROSTHESIS REMOVAL AND PLACED SPACER. THE CULTURES REPORT ERYSIPELOTHRIX RHUSIOPATHIAE AND IS CONSULTED WITH INFECTIOLOGY AND ANTIBIOTIC MANAGEMENT IS INITIATED, A PATIENT CONTINUES TO BE HOSPITALIZED. THE EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO THE DEVICE BUT RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE. DEVICES ARE NOT RETURNING AND ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION RECEIVED AT THIS TIME

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 9699912 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page