Exactech 170-36-93Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862155481), received between Apr 11, 2022 and Nov 19, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Joint Laxity1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT HIP REPLACEMENT AND HAD SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 20730377 ↗InjuryNov 9, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT HIP REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2015. APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT HIP REVISION ON (B)(6) 2016. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN EARLY DEEP PERIPROSTHETIC INFECTION. AN EXCISIONAL ARTHROPLASTY OF HIS HIP WITH REMOVAL OF THE TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT AND INSERTION OF AN ANTIBIOTIC ARTICULATING SPACER. 6 WEEKS OF IV ANTIBIOTICS. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. REVISION OP REPORT ON (B)(6) 2016: DIAGNOSIS: HISTORY OF INFECTED TOTAL RIGHT HIP: FINDINGS: 1. INTRAOPERATIVE FINDINGS SHOWED NO GROSS EVIDENCE OF INFECTION 2. INTRAOPERATIVE FROZEN SECTIONS OF THE WORST-APPEARING TISSUE IN THE PERIACETABULAR REGIONS SHOWED NO EVIDENCE OF ACUTE INFLAMMATION. THERE WAS MILD TO MODERATE CONTAINED BONE LOSS OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR AND ACETABULUM. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED FROM THE OPERATING ROOM TO THE RECOVERY ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION, HAVING TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18100128 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2023Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED VIA CLINICAL STUDY, THAT THE 89 YO MALE PATIENT SUFFERED A DISLOCATION DUE TO A FAILED LEFT TKA SECONDARY TO INSTABILITY, RESULTING IN REVISION LEFT THA OF FEMORAL HEAD BALL AND ACETABULAR LINER. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2019.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 16769642 ↗InjuryOct 19, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INVESTIGATION OF A LEGAL CASE, A SECOND REVISION WAS FOUND. A FEMALE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LEFT HIP REVISION ON (B)(6) 2019, UNDERWENT A REVISION ON (B)(6) 2019, FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS REVISED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION KNOWN. FIRST REVISION REPORTED UNDER 1038671-2022-01027.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15635861 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTHS POST INITIAL LEFT THA, THIS (B)(6) MALE PATIENT HAD A PERIPROSTHETIC HIP FRACTURE. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW IT HAPPENED. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO AN ALTEON MONOBLOC STEM AND BIOLOX DELTA HEAD WERE IMPLANTED. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICES OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. SALES REP WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN PHOTOS/X-RAYS. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 14074446 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page