Skip to content

Exactech 170-36-93Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862155481), received between Apr 11, 2022 and Nov 19, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT HIP REPLACEMENT AND HAD SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20730377 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT HIP REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2015. APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT HIP REVISION ON (B)(6) 2016. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN EARLY DEEP PERIPROSTHETIC INFECTION. AN EXCISIONAL ARTHROPLASTY OF HIS HIP WITH REMOVAL OF THE TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT AND INSERTION OF AN ANTIBIOTIC ARTICULATING SPACER. 6 WEEKS OF IV ANTIBIOTICS. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. REVISION OP REPORT ON (B)(6) 2016: DIAGNOSIS: HISTORY OF INFECTED TOTAL RIGHT HIP: FINDINGS: 1. INTRAOPERATIVE FINDINGS SHOWED NO GROSS EVIDENCE OF INFECTION 2. INTRAOPERATIVE FROZEN SECTIONS OF THE WORST-APPEARING TISSUE IN THE PERIACETABULAR REGIONS SHOWED NO EVIDENCE OF ACUTE INFLAMMATION. THERE WAS MILD TO MODERATE CONTAINED BONE LOSS OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR AND ACETABULUM. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED FROM THE OPERATING ROOM TO THE RECOVERY ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION, HAVING TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18100128 ↗
  • InjuryApr 19, 2023Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA CLINICAL STUDY, THAT THE 89 YO MALE PATIENT SUFFERED A DISLOCATION DUE TO A FAILED LEFT TKA SECONDARY TO INSTABILITY, RESULTING IN REVISION LEFT THA OF FEMORAL HEAD BALL AND ACETABULAR LINER. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2019.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 16769642 ↗
  • InjuryOct 19, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE INVESTIGATION OF A LEGAL CASE, A SECOND REVISION WAS FOUND. A FEMALE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LEFT HIP REVISION ON (B)(6) 2019, UNDERWENT A REVISION ON (B)(6) 2019, FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS REVISED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION KNOWN. FIRST REVISION REPORTED UNDER 1038671-2022-01027.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15635861 ↗
  • InjuryApr 11, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTHS POST INITIAL LEFT THA, THIS (B)(6) MALE PATIENT HAD A PERIPROSTHETIC HIP FRACTURE. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW IT HAPPENED. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO AN ALTEON MONOBLOC STEM AND BIOLOX DELTA HEAD WERE IMPLANTED. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICES OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. SALES REP WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN PHOTOS/X-RAYS. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 14074446 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page