Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-010-03-0320Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862158093), received between Dec 4, 2019 and Mar 6, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K111400); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Bacterial Infection1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Inflammation1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Pain1
  • Scar Tissue1
  • Swelling/ Edema1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 6, 2024Unstable; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Unstable; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    ADDITIONAL DETAILS FROM A LEGAL SHORT FORM AND OPERATIVE REPORT. THE SHORT FORM INDICATED THE PATIENT SUFFERED IMMENSE PAIN, LOSS OF CONSORTIUM, AND LOSS OF MOBILITY. PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS-FAILED RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO INSTABILITY. POST-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS-FAILED RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO INSTABILITY, PROBABLY RIGHT DISEASE, AND FEMORAL COMPONENT DEBONDING. ONCE THE SURGEON ENTERED THE JOINT, THERE WERE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SYNOVIAL TISSUE CONSISTENT WITH POLY WEAR DISEASE. SIGNIFICANT POLY WEAR OBSERVED ON THE WEIGHT BEARING PORTION OF THE LATERAL CONDYLE. THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS DEBONDED FROM THE UNDERLYING BONE, AND THE TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS IN SIGNIFICANT VARUS MALALIGNMENT.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Inflammation; Joint Laxity; Pain; Scar Tissue; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 18852269 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED BY (B)(6) NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY ((B)(6)), A (B)(6) Y/O, 161 CM, (B)(6) KG (BMI=31), FEMALE PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY TOTAL PROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT OF THE RIGHT KNEE VIA MEDIAL PARAPATELLAR APPROACH ON (B)(6) 2014. THE INDICATION FOR THE INDEX PROCEDURE WAS OSTEOARTHRITIS. ON (B)(6) 2015, APPROXIMATELY 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO INFECTION. FOLLOW-UPS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CANNOT BE PERFORMED FOR THIS COMPLAINT, INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED AS COMPLETE BY THE (B)(6) NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY ((B)(6)); THERE IS NO IDENTIFICATION OF FACILITIES OR SURGEONS. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION ABOUT THE EVENT AND/OR PATIENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED. THESE DEVICES ARE USED FOR TREATMENT NOT DIAGNOSIS. BASED ON REVIEW OF ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THE REPORTED EVENT IS RELATED TO ANY DEVICE DESIGN OR MANUFACTURING ISSUES. THE EVENT REPORTED WAS LIKELY THE RESULT OF PATIENT CONDITIONS. THERE HAS BEEN NO PATIENT MEDICAL HISTORY/INFORMATION PROVIDED; THEREFORE, THE PATIENT RISK/CLINICAL FACTORS CANNOT BE ASSESSED.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 9700356 ↗
  • InjuryDec 4, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, A (B)(6) FEMALE WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016. ON (B)(6) 2019 THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY. THE DEVICES WERE DISPOSED OF BY THE HOSPITAL. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9413286 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K111400. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0583-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Optetrak Logic Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 02-012-47-3011, b) 02-012-47-5009, c) 02-012-47-5011, d) 02-012-65-3013

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page