Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-010-04-0340Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862158390), received between Oct 26, 2022 and Apr 2, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Osteolysis3
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 2, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL TOTAL REPLACEMENT ON THE RIGHT SIDE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED FEMORAL LOOSENING SECONDARY TO TIBIAL AND PATELLA POLYETHYLENE WEAR. AS A RESULT, APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS EIGHT MONTHS POST-SURGERY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 3 FOR THIS EVENT/PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 24768450 ↗
  • InjuryJun 2, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY FIVE YEARS POST INITIAL RIGHT TKA, THE 56 Y/O MALE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR AND FEMORAL LOOSENING, AS A RESULT OF OSTEOLYSIS. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A SIZE 4 FEMORAL COMPONENT AND A SIZE 4 TIBIAL INSERT. THERE WAS BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 22126431 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, THE 84 YEAR OLD MALE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT TKA ON (B)(6) 2017. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2024 DUE TO FEMUR LOOSENING, OSTEOLYSIS, AND POLY WEAR. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. X-RAYS AND PHOTOS RECEIVED. THE DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION DUE TO THE DEVICES WERE DISPOSED AT HOSPITAL

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 19112506 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2018, UNDERWENT A REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS 5 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. REASON FOR REVISION REPORTED WAS LOOSENING DUE TO OSTEOLYSIS. THE IMPLANTS WERE REPLACED WITH COMPETITORS¿ DEVICES. NO FURTHER INFORMATION KNOWN.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 15674304 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page