Optetrak Logic 02-010-04-0340Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Optetrak Logic (408)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862158390), received between Oct 26, 2022 and Apr 2, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Osteolysis3
- Aseptic loosening1
- Failure of Implant1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 2, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL TOTAL REPLACEMENT ON THE RIGHT SIDE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED FEMORAL LOOSENING SECONDARY TO TIBIAL AND PATELLA POLYETHYLENE WEAR. AS A RESULT, APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS EIGHT MONTHS POST-SURGERY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 3 FOR THIS EVENT/PATIENT.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening
MAUDE report 24768450 ↗InjuryJun 2, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY FIVE YEARS POST INITIAL RIGHT TKA, THE 56 Y/O MALE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO POLYETHYLENE WEAR AND FEMORAL LOOSENING, AS A RESULT OF OSTEOLYSIS. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A SIZE 4 FEMORAL COMPONENT AND A SIZE 4 TIBIAL INSERT. THERE WAS BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 22126431 ↗InjuryApr 15, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AS REPORTED, THE 84 YEAR OLD MALE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT TKA ON (B)(6) 2017. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2024 DUE TO FEMUR LOOSENING, OSTEOLYSIS, AND POLY WEAR. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. X-RAYS AND PHOTOS RECEIVED. THE DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION DUE TO THE DEVICES WERE DISPOSED AT HOSPITAL
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 19112506 ↗InjuryOct 26, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2018, UNDERWENT A REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS 5 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. REASON FOR REVISION REPORTED WAS LOOSENING DUE TO OSTEOLYSIS. THE IMPLANTS WERE REPLACED WITH COMPETITORS¿ DEVICES. NO FURTHER INFORMATION KNOWN.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 15674304 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page