Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-44-1013Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862173416), received between Jun 8, 2022 and Sep 11, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn3

Patient problems

  • Osteolysis2
  • Pain2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Balance Problems1
  • Discomfort1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 11, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    LEGAL CASE ¿ (B)(4) LONG FORM IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 76 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT HAS EXPERIENCED PROSTHESIS WEARPAIN, DISCOMFORT, GAIT IMPAIRMENT, BONE LOSS. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. (B)(6) LOGIC TIBIA IMPLANT PSC SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) IS CONFIRMED TO HAVE BEEN PACKAGED IN A VACUUM BAG THAT DOES NOT CONTAIN EVOH. 510K: K110547.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Balance Problems; Discomfort; Loss of Range of Motion; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 20189100 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2012. THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH MODERATELY SEVERE POLYMERIC-INDUCED SYNOVITIS WITH SEVERE FEMORAL OSTEOLYSIS AND MORE FOCAL TIBIAL OSTEOLYSIS, SYNOVIAL EXPANSION INTO THE GUTTERS EFFACES THE COLLATERAL LIGAMENTS. UNUNITED BONY FRAGMENTS WERE IDENTIFIED ADJACENT TO THE MCL. APPROXIMATELY 10 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO POLYMERIC-INDUCED SYNOVITIS. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE OR PATIENT OUTCOME. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 18120162 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2022Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY TWO YEARS POST INITIAL LEFT TKA, THE 66 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT HAD A REVISION. PATIENT WAS COMPLAINING SINCE 6 MONTHS OF ORIGINAL TKA OF PAIN, SWELLING AND DISCOMFORT. PATIENT HAD LITTLE INFLAMMATORY SYNDROME BUT PRESENCE OF GRANULUM. THE PE IS HEAVILY WORN BEHIND THE POSTERIOR CAM AND IN THE ANGLE OF THE EXTERNAL FEMORAL CONDYLE. ONLY PATIENT'S INSERT HAS BEEN REPLACED. X-RAYS AND PHOTOS RECEIVED. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 14632498 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page