Optetrak Logic 02-012-44-2515Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Optetrak Logic (408)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862173546), received between Aug 7, 2020 and Oct 8, 2024 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (5 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified
Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.
Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Naturally Worn5
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth4
- Unstable2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant9
- Pain3
- Swelling/ Edema2
- Synovitis2
- Abdominal Pain1
- Cyst(s)1
- Inflammation1
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 8, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
LEGAL CASE ¿ USA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 83 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, MECHANICAL FAILURE. REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE NOTES WERE PROVIDED. PATIENT LEFT THE OPERATING ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THE SERIAL NUMBER (B)(6) IS CONFIRMED TO BE A PART OF RECALL NUMBER: Z-0021-2022.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 20402312 ↗InjuryFeb 22, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT HAD A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2018, AND THEN EXPERIENCED REVISION SURGICAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT. NO IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. THERE IS NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18758343 ↗InjuryMay 1, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
PER A REPORT FROM THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2016. APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL SURGERY THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO PROFOUND SWELLING. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. REVISION OP REPORT: (B)(6) 2023/ K MCGUINNESS RECEIVED VIA LEGAL 11 APR 2023. DIAGNOSIS: FAILED LEFT KNEE SECONDARY TO WEAR OF THE BEARING SURFACE. THERE WAS A VERY LARGE SYNOVIAL EFFUSION THAT CONSISTED PRIMARILY OF MONOCYTES AND MACROPHAGES. NO EVIDENCE OF LOOSENING OF THE PATIENT'S COMPONENTS ON PREOPERATIVE X-RAYS. DURING SURGERY THERE WAS VERY EXTENSIVE SYNOVIAL EXPANSION WITH FOREIGN BODY-TYPE REACTION. NO SIGN OF OSTEOLYSIS BUT THE TIBIAL POLYETHYLENE INSERT SHOWED SEVERE WEARING AND DELAMINATION. NO COMPLICATIONS DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS AWAKENED AND TAKEN TO THE RECOVERY ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 16843531 ↗InjuryJan 4, 2023Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: WHITE/CLOUDY RESIDUE APPEARED TO BE FLOATING IN THE TUBING. NO INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Failure of Implant; Inflammation; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis
MAUDE report 16095630 ↗InjuryJun 9, 2022Material Fragmentation; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Material Fragmentation; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information
AS REPORTED BY THE LEGAL BRIEF, ON (B)(6) 2020, PATIENT UNDERWENT A TKA ON HER RIGHT KNEE AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN OPTETRAK TKA SYSTEM. PATIENT'S OPTETRAK TKA SYSTEM SUBSEQUENTLY FAILED IN (B)(6) 2022-LESS THAN TWO (2) YEARS AFTER IT WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED. AS A RESULT, PATIENT REQUIRED AN ADDITIONAL SURGERY TO REMOVE AND REPLACE IT WITH ANOTHER JOINT REPLACEMENT SYSTEM. BECAUSE PATIENT REQUIRED AN ADDITIONAL REVISION SURGERY, PATIENT HAS SUFFERED SIGNIFICANT AND CONTINUING PERSONAL INJURIES, IS LIMITED IN HER ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING, REQUIRES ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY, AND HAS INCURRED SUBSTANTIAL MEDICAL BILLS AND EXPENSES. AS A DIRECT, PROXIMATE AND RESULT, PATIENT HAS SUFFERED AND CONTINUES TO SUFFER SIGNIFICANT, PERMANENT, AND CONTINUING PERSONAL INJURIES, AS DESCRIBED HEREIN.
Patient problems: Abdominal Pain; Failure of Implant; Joint Laxity; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis
MAUDE report 14645221 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2022Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST RIGHT SIDE TKA, THIS FEMALE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE OR FORTHCOMING. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 13415524 ↗InjuryJan 27, 2022Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 9 YEARS POST INITIAL RIGHT TKA IMPLANT, THIS FEMALE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE OR FORTHCOMING. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 13366906 ↗InjuryAug 12, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
ON (B)(6) 2012, A (B)(6) Y/O, FEMALE PATIENT WITH A BMI OF 36.9, UNDERWENT IMPLANTATION OF A INSERT TIBIA LOGIC PSC 2.5 15M. ON (B)(6) 2019, APPROXIMATELY 89 MONTHS POST IMPLANT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10399829 ↗InjuryAug 7, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
ON (B)(6) 2015, A (B)(6) Y/O, MALE PATIENT WITH A BMI OF 31.6, UNDERWENT IMPLANTATION OF A INSERT TIB 2.5 15MM KNEE POSTSTAB CNSTR. ON (B)(6) 2019, APPROXIMATELY 49 MONTHS POST IMPLANT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10382053 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page