Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-48-3013Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862174406), received between Sep 7, 2022 and Dec 7, 2023 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K111400); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn3
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant3
  • Implant Pain2
  • Pain2
  • Swelling/ Edema2
  • Discomfort1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Scar Tissue1
  • Unspecified Musculoskeletal problem1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 7, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2017. APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A RIGHT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. REVISION OP REPORT 17 APR 2022 THE PREVIOUS LINER WAS DISLODGED FROM THE TIBIAL COMPONENT. UPON INSPECTION THERE WAS SEVERE DELAMINATION WEAR ON THE SURFACE OF THE POLYETHYLENE. BOTH TIBIAL AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS HAD AREA OF SEVERE OSTEOLYSIS LEADING TO DEBONDING AT THE BONE CEMENT JOINT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Osteolysis; Scar Tissue; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 18284492 ↗
  • InjuryJun 1, 2023Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT A PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2018, THE PATIENT HAS PAIN, STIFFNESS, AND WEAKNESS. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE ARE NO RADIOGRAPHS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Implant Pain; Pain; Unspecified Musculoskeletal problem

    MAUDE report 17039805 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT TKA ON (B)(6) 2018. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BACK TO THE SURGEON WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN, SWELLING, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR RIGHT TKA. AFTER EXAMINATION, THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR INITIAL REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2022, WHERE ALL OF THE EXACTECH IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE POLY SHOWED WEAR AND IS A PART OF THE RECALL. AN INFECTION PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTIC TKA WAS PLACED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT RETURNED ON (B)(6) 2022 FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLACTIC TKA AND WAS RE-IMPLANTED WITH A COMPETITORS REVISION TOTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF DEVICES AND A 45 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY. NO ADVERSE EVENTS AS A RESULT OF THE SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT REQUIRED PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THIS ISSUE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 16492620 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT TKA ON (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT HAD A POLY SWAP AND WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 15369749 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K111400. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0583-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Optetrak Logic Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 02-012-47-3011, b) 02-012-47-5009, c) 02-012-47-5011, d) 02-012-65-3013

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page