Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-51-2009Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862230324), received between Jun 6, 2023 and Jul 29, 2025 — classified as 10 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (9 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn9
  • Unstable3
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Off-Label Use1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information6
  • Failure of Implant4
  • Joint Laxity4
  • Pain4
  • Implant Pain3
  • Osteolysis3
  • Swelling/ Edema3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 29, 2025Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE DEVICE FAILED AS INTENDED AS THE POLY WORE OUT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22660907 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 6, 2025Off-Label Use; Use of Device Problem; Off-Label Use; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION PROCEDURE FOR A 73 YO FEMALE PATIENT, A WRONG INSERT WAS IMPLANTED. THE IN-SITU IMPLANTS WERE A SIZE 3 FEMORAL COMPONENT AND A SIZE 3F/2T TIBIAL PLATE. AS A RESULT, THE TIBIAL INSERT REQUIRED WAS A SIZE 3, TO MATCH BOTH FEMUR AND TIBIAL LOCKING MECHANISM; HOWEVER, A SIZE 2 INSERT WAS IMPLANTED. THE SURGEON WAS NOTIFIED THAT A REVISION PROCEDURE MAY BE RECOMMENDED. UNKNOWN IF A REVISION HAS BEEN SCHEDULED AT THIS TIME. NO PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED. THIS IS 1 OF 3 EVENTS FOR THIS PATIENT. SEE MDR# 1038671-2025-01881 FOR LEFT KNEE REVISION AND MDR# 1038671-2023-01420 FOR RIGHT KNEE REVISION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21971053 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS 60 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT'S LEFT KNEE WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS POST OP. FEMUR AND TIBIA WERE REVISED DUE TO OSTEO-LYSIS AND FEMORAL LOOSENING. SURGEON REMOVED ALL EXACTECH DEVICES AND PUT ANOTHER COMPANIES PRODUCT IN. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. PRODUCT NOT RETURNING - DISCARDED AT THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 20136700 ↗
  • InjuryJun 10, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Insufficient Information; Joint Laxity; Osteolysis; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 19500410 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 22, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT HAD A LEFT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2016, AND THEN EXPERIENCED REVISION SURGICAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER INITIAL IMPLANT. NO IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. THERE IS NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 18759599 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2023Unstable; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unstable; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 4.5 YEARS POST INITIAL LEFT TKA, THE 64 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT RETURNED TO SURGEON'S OFFICE WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN, SWELLING, INSTABILITY, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR TKA. THE PATIENT HAS A RECALLED IMPLANT. UPON EXAMINATION, THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A REVISION TKA POSSIBLE POLY SWAP. THE PATIENT HAD REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A POLY TIBIAL INSERT SWAP. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. PHOTOS & X-RAYS RECEIVED. THE DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION AS THEY WERE DISCARDED BY THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Laxity; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 18083868 ↗
  • InjuryOct 10, 2023Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2015. APPROXIMATELY 7 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT HAS SUFFERED THE FOLLOWING INJURIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SEVERE PAIN, SWELLING, INSTABILITY, FALLS, WEAKNESS, AND LIMITED MOBILITY. THE PATIENT HAS FILED A SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT IN A MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TITLED IN RE: EXACTECH POLYETHYLENE ORTHOPEDIC PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL NO. 3044 (NGG) (MMH), AND PENDING IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. PER THE TRANSFER ORDER CREATING THIS MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, ¿PLAINTIFFS¿ALLEGE THAT THEIR KNEE OR HIP REPLACEMENT DEVICES¿FAILED PREMATURELY BECAUSE OF DEGRADATION OF THE DEVICE¿S POLYETHYLENE COMPONENT, WHICH RESULTED IN THE PREMATURE REMOVAL (OR PLANNED REMOVAL) OF THE PROSTHESIS AT ISSUE.¿ BECAUSE THE PATIENT HAS FILED A SUIT IN THIS MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, THE PATIENT APPEARS TO ALLEGE THAT THE PATIENT WAS INJURED AS A RESULT OF PREMATURE WEAR OF AN EXACTECH POLYETHYLENE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Insufficient Information; Joint Laxity; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 17903614 ↗
  • InjuryJun 28, 2023Naturally Worn; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Naturally Worn; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS POST OP INITIAL LEFT TKA, THIS 70 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO POLY WEAR. PATELLA AND LINER WERE EXCHANGED. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. DEVICE IS NOT RETURNING - DISPOSED AT THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17215636 ↗
  • InjuryJun 20, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS POST INITIAL LEFT TKA, THE 72 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT HAD A REVISION DUE TO POLY WEAR. PATIENT'S LINER, PATELLA AND FEMORAL COMPONENT WERE EXCHANGED TO A PS TOTAL KNEE. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. IMAGES RECEIVED. SALES REP WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN X-RAYS. THE DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION AS THEY WERE DISPOSED BY HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17160081 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2023Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2017 AND THEN APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS, 2 MONTHS LATER, ON (B)(6) 2023, THEY EXPERIENCED A REVISION SURGERY. REVISION OPERATIVE REPORT OF (B)(6) 2023. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: PAINFUL RIGHT KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN, INSTABILITY THIS WAS WORSENING OVER TIME. CLINICAL EXAMINATION IMAGING WAS CONSISTENT WITH POSSIBLE SYMPTOMATIC POLYETHYLENE WEAR. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF PURULENCE. THERE WAS A SMALL EFFUSION, THERE WAS WHITE SYNOVITIS INVOLVING THE KNEE WHICH CAN BE SEEN WITH POLY WEAR. NO LOOSENING/INSTABILITY OF THE FEMORAL OR TIBIAL COMPONENTS. THERE WAS A SMALL AMOUNT OF OSTEOLYSIS EVIDENT ALONG THE LATERAL MARGIN OF THE FEMUR. THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT WEAR INVOLVING THE ANTERIOR ASPECT OF THE PATELLA. THERE WAS ENOUGH WEAR OF THE PATELLA THAT IT COULD POTENTIALLY CAUSE SOME PARTICLE DISEASE. PATELLA COMPONENT WAS REVISED. STERILE DRESSING WAS APPLIED, AND THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO RECOVERY INSTABLE CONDITION. PATIENT WILL FOLLOW UP WITH ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC 2 WEEKS POST OP. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE I

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Implant Pain; Joint Laxity; Joint effusion; Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 17109289 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY TWO YEARS POST INITIAL RIGHT TKA, THE FEMALE PATIENT HAD A REVISION DUE TO POLY WEAR. PATIENT'S LINER WAS REVISED TO AN EXACTECH DEVICE. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. IMAGES RECEIVED. SALES REP WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN X-RAYS. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION AS IT WAS DISPOSED BY HOSPITAL. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17068174 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page