Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-51-2013Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862230348), received between Oct 29, 2024 and Mar 18, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn2
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Joint Laxity2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Pain1
  • Scar Tissue1
  • Swelling/ Edema1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 18, 2025Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA A LEGAL SHORT FORM AND OTHER SOURCES, THAT A 62 YO FEMALE PATIENT, WHO HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED WITH RECALLED POLY ON (B)(6) 2019, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS 3 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE SURGEON¿S OFFICE WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN, SWELLING, INSTABILITY, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR RIGHT TKA. THE SHORT FORM INDICATED THE PATIENT SUFFERED IMMENSE PAIN, LOSS OF CONSORTIUM, AND LOSS OF MOBILITY. UPON EXAMINATION, THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED TO HAVE A REVISION TKA POSSIBLE POLY SWAP VS FULL REVISION. PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FAILED RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO INSTABILITY. POST-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FAILED RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO INSTABILITY, PROBABLY RIGHT DISEASE, AND FEMORAL COMPONENT DEBONDING. ONCE THE SURGEON ENTERED THE JOINT, THERE WERE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SYNOVIAL TISSUE CONSISTENT WITH POLY WEAR DISEASE. SIGNIFICANT POLY WEAR ON THE WEIGHT BEARING PORTION OF THE LATERAL CONDYLE. THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS DEBONDED FROM THE UNDERLYING BONE, AND THE TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS IN SIGNIFICANT VARUS MALALIGNMENT. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A FULL KNEE REVISION TO A

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Joint Laxity; Pain; Scar Tissue; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 21638831 ↗
  • InjuryOct 29, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) ON (B)(6) 2020. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2023 DUE TO FEMORAL LOOSENING AND POLY WEAR ON THE PATELLA, WHICH RESULTED IN INSTABILITY. ALL COMPONENTS WERE REVISED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED. ASSOCIATED WITH 1038671-2023-02914 AND 1038671-2024-03158.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20560033 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page