Optetrak Logic 02-012-51-2013Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Optetrak Logic (408)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862230348), received between Oct 29, 2024 and Mar 18, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified
Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.
Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Naturally Worn2
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Joint Laxity2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Pain1
- Scar Tissue1
- Swelling/ Edema1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 18, 2025Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED VIA A LEGAL SHORT FORM AND OTHER SOURCES, THAT A 62 YO FEMALE PATIENT, WHO HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED WITH RECALLED POLY ON (B)(6) 2019, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS 3 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE SURGEON¿S OFFICE WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN, SWELLING, INSTABILITY, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR RIGHT TKA. THE SHORT FORM INDICATED THE PATIENT SUFFERED IMMENSE PAIN, LOSS OF CONSORTIUM, AND LOSS OF MOBILITY. UPON EXAMINATION, THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED TO HAVE A REVISION TKA POSSIBLE POLY SWAP VS FULL REVISION. PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FAILED RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO INSTABILITY. POST-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FAILED RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO INSTABILITY, PROBABLY RIGHT DISEASE, AND FEMORAL COMPONENT DEBONDING. ONCE THE SURGEON ENTERED THE JOINT, THERE WERE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SYNOVIAL TISSUE CONSISTENT WITH POLY WEAR DISEASE. SIGNIFICANT POLY WEAR ON THE WEIGHT BEARING PORTION OF THE LATERAL CONDYLE. THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS DEBONDED FROM THE UNDERLYING BONE, AND THE TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS IN SIGNIFICANT VARUS MALALIGNMENT. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A FULL KNEE REVISION TO A
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Joint Laxity; Pain; Scar Tissue; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 21638831 ↗InjuryOct 29, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) ON (B)(6) 2020. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2023 DUE TO FEMORAL LOOSENING AND POLY WEAR ON THE PATELLA, WHICH RESULTED IN INSTABILITY. ALL COMPONENTS WERE REVISED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED. ASSOCIATED WITH 1038671-2023-02914 AND 1038671-2024-03158.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 20560033 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page