Optetrak Logic 02-012-51-2511Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Optetrak Logic (408)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862230379), received between Apr 28, 2023 and Sep 12, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (3 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified
Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.
Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Naturally Worn3
- Unstable2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Pain3
- Synovitis3
- Joint Laxity2
- Swelling/ Edema2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Emotional Changes1
- Inflammation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 12, 2024Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 36 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, SEVER PAIN, SIGNIFICANT SCARRING, SWELLING, EFFUSION, INFLAMMATION, KNEE POPPING/CLUNKING, KNEE INSTABILITY, DIFFICULTY WALKING, ANTALGIC GAIT, SYNOVITIS , ADDITIONAL SURGERIES, ANXIETY AND EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Inflammation; Joint Laxity; Joint effusion; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis
MAUDE report 20199065 ↗InjuryJun 26, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT HAD A LEFT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION ON (B)(6) 2016 AND THEN APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS LATER HAD A SURGICAL REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO EXACTECH DEVICES. REVISION OPERATIVE REPORT OF (B)(6) 2022 -TO REVISE LEFT TIBIA AND TIBIAL POLY; FOR OTHER MECHANICAL COMPLICATIONS OF INTERNAL LEFT KNEE PROSTHESIS. PROCEDURE: CLEAR SYNOVIAL FLUID WAS NOTED ONCE THE JOINT WAS ENTERED. THE JOINT HAD OBVIOUS EVIDENCE OF POLYETHYLENE WEAR DEBRIS WITH DIFFUSE CLUSTERS OF WHITE SYNOVITIS. DELAMINATION ON THE MEDIAL ASPECT OF THE TIBIAL POLYETHYLENE WAS IMMEDIATELY NOTED. A COMPLETE SYNOVECTOMY WAS ACCOMPLISHED. THE FEMUR WAS INSPECTED AND WAS RIGIDLY FIXED WITH NO EVIDENCE OF LOOSENING. THE TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS REMOVED AND THERE WAS EXTENSIVE OSTEOLYSIS MEDIALLY. NEW DEVICES WERE FITTED AND IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS AWAKENED AND TRANSFERRED TO RECOVERY IN GOOD CONDITION AFTER APPLICATION OF A BULKY STERILE DRESSING. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL I
Patient problems: Emotional Changes; Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis
MAUDE report 17198686 ↗InjuryApr 28, 2023Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information
AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, THIS PATIENT IS VERIFIED RIGHT KNEE DONE ON (B)(6) 2017. SHE HAD THE RIGHT KNEE REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS 7 MONTHS AFTER THEIR INITIAL PROCEDURE. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: RIGHT KNEE ARTHROFIBROSIS WITH INSTABILITY, MORBID OBESITY WITH BODY MASS INDEX OF 43. THE POLYETHYLENE WAS NOTED TO HAVE "SIGNIFICANT POSTERIOR POLYETHYLENE WEAR." THE OTHER IMPLANTS WERE ADEQUATELY POSITIONED AND WELL FIXED. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE OR PATIENT OUTCOME. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Joint Laxity; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis
MAUDE report 16829466 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page