Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-51-2511Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862230379), received between Apr 28, 2023 and Sep 12, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn3
  • Unstable2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Pain3
  • Synovitis3
  • Joint Laxity2
  • Swelling/ Edema2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Emotional Changes1
  • Inflammation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 12, 2024Unstable; Naturally Worn; Unstable; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 36 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, SEVER PAIN, SIGNIFICANT SCARRING, SWELLING, EFFUSION, INFLAMMATION, KNEE POPPING/CLUNKING, KNEE INSTABILITY, DIFFICULTY WALKING, ANTALGIC GAIT, SYNOVITIS , ADDITIONAL SURGERIES, ANXIETY AND EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Inflammation; Joint Laxity; Joint effusion; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 20199065 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT HAD A LEFT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION ON (B)(6) 2016 AND THEN APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS LATER HAD A SURGICAL REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO EXACTECH DEVICES. REVISION OPERATIVE REPORT OF (B)(6) 2022 -TO REVISE LEFT TIBIA AND TIBIAL POLY; FOR OTHER MECHANICAL COMPLICATIONS OF INTERNAL LEFT KNEE PROSTHESIS. PROCEDURE: CLEAR SYNOVIAL FLUID WAS NOTED ONCE THE JOINT WAS ENTERED. THE JOINT HAD OBVIOUS EVIDENCE OF POLYETHYLENE WEAR DEBRIS WITH DIFFUSE CLUSTERS OF WHITE SYNOVITIS. DELAMINATION ON THE MEDIAL ASPECT OF THE TIBIAL POLYETHYLENE WAS IMMEDIATELY NOTED. A COMPLETE SYNOVECTOMY WAS ACCOMPLISHED. THE FEMUR WAS INSPECTED AND WAS RIGIDLY FIXED WITH NO EVIDENCE OF LOOSENING. THE TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS REMOVED AND THERE WAS EXTENSIVE OSTEOLYSIS MEDIALLY. NEW DEVICES WERE FITTED AND IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS AWAKENED AND TRANSFERRED TO RECOVERY IN GOOD CONDITION AFTER APPLICATION OF A BULKY STERILE DRESSING. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL I

    Patient problems: Emotional Changes; Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 17198686 ↗
  • InjuryApr 28, 2023Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION, THIS PATIENT IS VERIFIED RIGHT KNEE DONE ON (B)(6) 2017. SHE HAD THE RIGHT KNEE REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS 7 MONTHS AFTER THEIR INITIAL PROCEDURE. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: RIGHT KNEE ARTHROFIBROSIS WITH INSTABILITY, MORBID OBESITY WITH BODY MASS INDEX OF 43. THE POLYETHYLENE WAS NOTED TO HAVE "SIGNIFICANT POSTERIOR POLYETHYLENE WEAR." THE OTHER IMPLANTS WERE ADEQUATELY POSITIONED AND WELL FIXED. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE OR PATIENT OUTCOME. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Joint Laxity; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 16829466 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page