Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-51-2513Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862230386), received between Apr 21, 2023 and Dec 29, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn2
  • Lack of Effect1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 29, 2025Naturally Worn; Lack of Effect; Naturally Worn; Lack of Effect

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 73 YO MALE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LEFT TKA, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE APPROXIMATELY 7 YEARS 2 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BACK TO THE SURGEON¿S OFFICE WITH COMPLAINTS OF STIFFNESS, PAIN, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR LEFT TOTAL KNEE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED INDICATED THE PATIENT HAD A LOSS OF RANGE OF MOTION. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A REVISION LEFT TKA POSSIBLE POLYETHYLENE SWAP AND SUBSEQUENTLY UNDERWENT A TIBIAL POLY IMPLANT SWAP AND PATELLA IMPLANT SWAP. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL DELAYS OR DEVICE BREAKAGES DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. X-RAY IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN AS THEY WERE DISCARDED BY THE HOSPITAL. NO IMAGES OF THE EXPLANTED DEVICES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain

    MAUDE report 23918050 ↗
  • InjuryApr 21, 2023Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    PER A REPORT FROM THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT A FEMALE PATIENT (DOB (B)(6) 1951) HAD A LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2017. APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022. OP REPORT: THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THERE WAS EXCESSIVE SYNOVITIS CHARACTERISTIC OF THIRD BODY WEAR FROM POLYETHYLENE DEBRIS. THE TIBIA HAD EXTENSIVE OSTEOLYSIS AND LOOSENING. THE PATIENT WAS AWAKENED AND TRANSFERRED TO THE RECOVERY ROOM IN GOOD CONDITION. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS DURING THE PROCEDURE. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 16784226 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page