Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-51-3509Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862230447), received between Aug 31, 2022 and Nov 12, 2023 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant5
  • Insufficient Information5
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Bacterial Infection1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Scar Tissue1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 12, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS POST RIGHT TKA, THE 79 Y/O MALE PATIENT HAD A REVISION DUE TO POLY WEAR. PATIENT WAS REVISED INTO A LOGIC PS. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. IMAGES RECEIVED. THE DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION AS THEY WERE DISCARDED BY THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18117454 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 2.5 YEARS POST OP INITIAL LEFT TKA, THIS 78 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE POLY WEAR. EVERYTHING WAS REVISED. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING EVENT. UNABLE TO OBTAIN X-RAYS. PRODUCT NOT RETURNING: DISPOSED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18083428 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT TKA ON (B)(6) 2020. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2023 AND THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND TIBIAL INSERT WERE REMOVED DUE TO WEAR AS WELL AS FEMORAL LOOSENING. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17706337 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 9, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 5 MONTHS POST OP THE INITIAL LEFT TKA, THIS 76 Y/O MALE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND REVISED. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY PROVIDED. DEVICES ARE NOT RETURNING, DISPOSED OF BY HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 16333792 ↗
  • InjuryDec 6, 2022Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY TWO YEARS POST INITIAL LEFT SIDE TKA, THE FEMALE PATIENT HAD A REVISION DUE TO POLY WEAR. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. SALES REP WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN X-RAYS & PHOTOS. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION DUE TO HOSPITAL DISPOSED THE DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15928223 ↗
  • InjuryOct 10, 2022Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT TKA ON (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO POLY WEAR. NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15569382 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2022Unstable; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unstable; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 62 YO MALE PATIENT, INITIAL LEFT KNEE IMPLANTED ON 10/17/2019, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS 9 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE DUE TO INSTABILITY. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE STABLE FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 15421956 ↗
  • InjuryAug 31, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 73 YO FEMALE PATIENT, WEIGHT 91.15 KG, THAT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT KNEE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE DUE TO A STIFF KNEE APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR 4 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL IMPLANT DATE. THEY WERE REVISED TO EXACTECH DEVICES. NO EXPLANT WILL BE RETURNED AS THEY WERE DISPOSED OF BY THE FACILITY. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. BASED ON REVIEW OF ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THE REPORTED EVENT IS RELATED TO ANY DESIGN OR MANUFACTURING ISSUES. THE CAUSE OF THE SUBSEQUENT REVISION CANNOT BE CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED; HOWEVER, IT IS MOST LIKELY RELATED TO THE PATIENT¿S UNDERLYING CONDITION.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Scar Tissue

    MAUDE report 15331635 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page