Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-51-4015Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862230515), received between Oct 9, 2023 and Jul 25, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (3 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn3
  • Unstable2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Joint Laxity2
  • Pain2
  • Swelling/ Edema2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 25, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MALE PATIENT, INITIAL LEFT KNEE IMPLANTED IN MAY 2018, UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE IN JULY 2024, APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS 10 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE REPRESENTATIVE INDICATED THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO GENERAL POLY WEAR LIKELY DUE TO THE RECALL. THE TIBIAL COMPONENT AND NEW POLY WERE IMPLANTED. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL DELAYS OR DEVICE BREAKAGES DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. AN X-RAY WAS PROVIDED. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ANALYSIS AS THEY WERE COLLECTED BY THE FACILITY AS A SPECIMEN. AN IMAGE OF THE POLY LINER WAS PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19827178 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2023Unstable; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT TKA ON (B)(6) 2020. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE SURGEON'S OFFICE WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN, SWELLING, INSTABILITY, AND DISSATISFACTION WITH THEIR TKA. THE PATIENT HAS A RECALLED IMPLANT. UPON EXAMINATION, THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A REVISION TKA POSSIBLE POLY SWAP VS. FULL REVISION. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON 16-OCT-2023. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Joint Laxity; Osteolysis; Pain; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 18089179 ↗
  • InjuryOct 9, 2023Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Unstable; Naturally Worn; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6)2017. APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS AFTER THE INITIAL PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A LEFT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT HAS SUFFERED THE FOLLOWING INJURIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SEVERE PAIN, SWELLING, INSTABILITY, MULTIPLE FALLS, AND HAVING TO UNDERGO REVISION SURGERY. THERE IS NO OTHER PATIENT DEMOGRAPHIC OR MEDICAL HISTORY AVAILABLE. THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE OR PATIENT OUTCOME. THERE IS NO DEVICE RETURN. THERE ARE NO PHOTOS OR OTHER IMAGES OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THE PATIENT HAS FILED A SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT IN A MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TITLED IN RE: EXACTECH POLYETHYLENE ORTHOPEDIC PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL NO. 3044 (NGG) (MMH), AND PENDING IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF (B)(6). PER THE TRANSFER ORDER CREATING THIS MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, ¿PLAINTIFFS¿ALLEGE THAT THEIR KNEE OR HIP REPLACEMENT DEVICES¿FAILED PREMATURELY BECAUSE OF DEGRADATION OF THE DEVICE¿S POLYETHYLENE COMPONENT, WHICH RESULTED IN THE PREMATURE REMOVAL (OR PLANNED REMOVAL) OF THE PROSTHESIS AT ISSUE.¿ BECAUSE THE PATIENT HAS FILED A S

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Joint Laxity; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 17894332 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page