Skip to content

Optetrak Logic 02-012-65-2015Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Optetrak Logic (408)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862265890), received between Dec 26, 2019 and Aug 28, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Lack of Effect” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K150890); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0021-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Lack of Effect1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 28, 2024Mechanical Problem; Lack of Effect; Mechanical Problem; Lack of Effect

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AGO THE PATIENT WAS REVISED FROM COMPETITOR DEVICES TO A CCK. RECENTLY, THE PATIENT CAME IN STIFF, SO WAS DOWNSIZED FROM A 15 CCK INSERT TO A 9 CCK INSERT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 20086018 ↗
  • InjuryDec 26, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED THIS 64 Y/O FEMALE¿S RIGHT KNEE WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED DURING A RTK PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2010. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR AN INFECTION OVER A YEAR AGO AND HAS BEEN EXPERIENCING VERY LIMITED RANGE OF MOTION AND HAD ROUGHLY A 20-DEGREE FLEXION CONTRACTURE AND BARELY 30 DEGREES OF FLEXION. THE SURGERY OPERATED NOT SURE WHAT THE ISSUE WAS BUT WAS THINKING POOR PHYSICAL THERAPY WHICH RESULTED IN SIGNIFICANT SCAR TISSUE. AS WAS EXPECTED, THERE WAS A LOT OF SCAR TISSUE REMOVED AND A LARGER CCK INSERT WAS USED (FROM A 15MM TO A 17MM). SURGEON WAS THRILLED ABOUT THE RANGE OF MOTION ACHIEVED POST-OPERATIVELY. BASED ON REVIEW OF ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THE REPORTED EVENT IS RELATED TO ANY DESIGN, MANUFACTURING, OR PATIENT RELATED ISSUES. THE CAUSE OF THE RANGE OF MOTION AND SUBSEQUENT REVISION CANNOT BE CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED SINCE THE DEVICES WERE NOT RETURNED; HOWEVER, IT IS MOST LIKELY IS RELATED TO PATIENT CONDITIONS.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9519536 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K150890. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0583-2024 · Nov 21, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Exactech Optetrak Logic Knee System, Catalog Numbers: a) 02-012-47-3011, b) 02-012-47-5009, c) 02-012-47-5011, d) 02-012-65-3013
  • Z-1364-2020 · Jan 27, 2020 · Open, Classified
    Truliant Splined Stem Extension, 18mm x 120mm - Product Usage: The devices are used in a cemented total knee prosthesis system, which provides femoral components, tibial inserts, s
  • Z-3209-2018 · May 8, 2018 · Open, Classified
    Optetrak Logic CC Stem Extension, 22mm x 160mm The OPTETRAK Logic CC Total Knee System is indicated for use in skeletally mature individuals undergoing primary surgery for total k
  • Z-2704-2017 · Apr 7, 2017 · Terminated
    Exactech Optetrak Logic CC 15mm Tibial Augment Screws

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page