Skip to content

Alteon 180-65-20Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Alteon (135)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862272645), received between Feb 12, 2025 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth5

Patient problems

  • Osteolysis5
  • Pain5
  • Aseptic loosening3
  • Scar Tissue3
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties2
  • Discomfort2
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT ON THE RIGHT SIDE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN, DISCOMFORT, OSTEOLYSIS AND ASEPTIC LOOSENING SECONDARY TO PROSTHESIS WEAR. AS A RESULT, APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS POST-SURGERY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT HAD DENSE SCAR TISSUE. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 3 FOR THIS EVENT/PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Aseptic loosening; Discomfort; Osteolysis; Pain; Scar Tissue

    MAUDE report 24732664 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT ON THE RIGHT SIDE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN, DISCOMFORT, OSTEOLYSIS AND ASEPTIC LOOSENING SECONDARY TO PROSTHESIS WEAR. AS A RESULT, APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS POST-SURGERY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT HAD DENSE SCAR TISSUE. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 3 FOR THIS EVENT/PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Aseptic loosening; Discomfort; Osteolysis; Pain; Scar Tissue

    MAUDE report 24730834 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 20, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL THA. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON DUE TO POLY WEAR AND OSTEOLYSIS IN THE ACETABULUM AND PROXIMAL FEMUR. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Osteolysis; Pain; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 24401544 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 67 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, MINIMAL PAIN, OSTEOLYSIS, POLYETHYLENE WEAR. REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE NOTES WERE PROVIDED. PATIENT LEFT THE OPERATING ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. POST OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS NOTED WEAR OF THE IMPLANT. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain; Scar Tissue

    MAUDE report 21538000 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 12, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 65 MONTHS AFTER A RIGHT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PROSTHESIS WEAR, PAIN, OSTEOLYTIC BONE LOSS, OSTEOLYTIC CHANGE, AND RECALLED POLYETHYLENE. REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE NOTES WERE PROVIDED. PATIENT LEFT THE OPERATING ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. POST OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS NOTED WEAR OF THE IMPLANT. NO FURTHER ISSUES OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 21368604 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page