Skip to content

Alteon 01-010-22-4245Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Alteon (135)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10885862282163), received between Apr 24, 2024 and Apr 24, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Periprosthetic fracture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 24, 2024Fracture; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Fracture; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN ORIGINAL COMPETITORS TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT HAD REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024 FOR METAL-ON-METAL IMPLANT REVISION TO POLY AND POSSIBLE LOOSE IMPLANTS. IN THE FIRST REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024 THE ORIGINAL COMPETITORS FEMORAL STEM PRESENTED TO BE LOOSE AND UNSTABLE. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH AN EXACTECH 22MMX245MM MONOBLOC HIP STEM AND 40MM +0MM HEAD AND A COMPETITORS POLY LINER IN THE ORIGINAL CUP. IT WAS NOTED IN THE REVISION SURGERY THAT THE PATIENT HAD THIN PROXIMAL FEMORAL CORTICES. POSTOPERATIVELY THE PATIENT PRESENTED BACK TO THE SURGEON'S OFFICE WITH A HAIRLINE FEMUR FRACTURE TO WHICH THE PATIENT WAS MADE NON-WEIGHT BEARING. THE PATIENT PRESENTED BACK WITH A DISPLACED FEMORAL HIP FRACTURE THAT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY TO ORIF. THE SECOND REVISION HIP SURGERY FOR FEMORAL FRACTURE WAS SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2024. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A 22MMX295MM MONOBLOC HIP STEM AND 40MM +0MM HEAD ALONG WITH A LATER FEMORAL HIP DIFFERENT COMPETITORS FRACTURE PLATE, SCREW, AND CABLES. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Periprosthetic fracture

    MAUDE report 19177729 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page