Skip to content

Truliant 02-022-51-3017Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Truliant (414)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862307675), received between Mar 14, 2025 and Mar 14, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 2 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Aug 30, 2021Class IIOpen, Classified

    Inserts were packaged in vacuum bags that lacked an additional oxygen barrier layer.

    Z-0023-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Mechanical Problem2

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2025Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION PROCEDURE OF A RIGHT TKA, THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCK THE POLYETHYLENE INSERT INTO PLACE IN THE APPROPRIATE FASHION. THERE WAS OBVIOUS LOOSENESS AND INSTABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPONENT. IT DID NOT APPEAR THAT THERE WAS OBVIOUS DAMAGE TO THE LOCKING MECHANISM ALTHOUGH THE SURGEON SUSPECTED THIS WAS LIKELY THE CASE GIVEN THE NEAR COMPLETE WEAR THROUGH OF POLYETHYLENE POSTERIORLY. ANOTHER NEW POLYETHYLENE WAS BROUGHT TO THE FIELD AS WELL. AGAIN, THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO SECURE THIS INTO PLACE USING THE STANDARD LOCKING MECHANISM. GIVEN THE INABILITY TO SECURE THE POLY, PLANS CHANGED TO A COMPLETE REVISION. THE SURGEON CAREFULLY REMOVED THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS. TIBIA AND FEMUR WERE REAMED. FULLY CEMENTED STEMS FOR TIBIA AND FEMUR WERE SELECTED. THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT BONE LOSS CENTRALLY AND A CONE WAS PREPPED FOR LATER PLACEMENT. 10 MM POSTERIOR AUGMENTS USED LATERALLY. CEMENT RESTRICTORS USED IN BOTH FEMUR AND TIBIA. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A COMPETITOR¿S DEVICES. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO DEVICE RETURNS AVAILABLE. THEY WERE SENT TO THE LAB AND LEGAL DEPARTMENT AT THE HOSPIT

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21609870 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2025Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION PROCEDURE OF A RIGHT TKA, THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCK THE POLYETHYLENE INSERT INTO PLACE IN THE APPROPRIATE FASHION. THERE WAS OBVIOUS LOOSENESS AND INSTABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPONENT. IT DID NOT APPEAR THAT THERE WAS OBVIOUS DAMAGE TO THE LOCKING MECHANISM ALTHOUGH THE SURGEON SUSPECTED THIS WAS LIKELY THE CASE GIVEN THE NEAR COMPLETE WEAR THROUGH OF POLYETHYLENE POSTERIORLY. ANOTHER NEW POLYETHYLENE WAS BROUGHT TO THE FIELD AS WELL. AGAIN, THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO SECURE THIS INTO PLACE USING THE STANDARD LOCKING MECHANISM. GIVEN THE INABILITY TO SECURE THE POLY, PLANS CHANGED TO A COMPLETE REVISION. THE SURGEON CAREFULLY REMOVED THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS. TIBIA AND FEMUR WERE REAMED. FULLY CEMENTED STEMS FOR TIBIA AND FEMUR WERE SELECTED. THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT BONE LOSS CENTRALLY AND A CONE WAS PREPPED FOR LATER PLACEMENT. 10 MM POSTERIOR AUGMENTS USED LATERALLY. CEMENT RESTRICTORS USED IN BOTH FEMUR AND TIBIA. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A COMPETITOR¿S DEVICES. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO DEVICE RETURNS AVAILABLE. THEY WERE SENT TO THE LAB AND LEGAL DEPARTMENT AT THE HOSPIT

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21609460 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page