Skip to content

Truliant 02-020-12-0335Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Truliant PS Porous Femoral · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Truliant (414)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862314901), received between Jun 13, 2022 and Feb 20, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth3
  • Packaging Problem1

Patient problems

  • Scar Tissue2
  • Emotional Changes1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Implant Pain1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Pain1
  • Swelling/ Edema1
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 20, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED VIA LEGAL NOTIFICATION: A MALE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2020, AND THEN UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AFTER IMPLANT PROCEDURE. REVISION SURGERY OPERATIVE REPORT OF (B)(6) 2022-FAILED RIGHT KNEE ARTHROPLASTY SECONDARY TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING AND POLY WEAR. OBESE BMI 37-THE DURATION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS INCREASED BY APPROXIMATELY 40%, DUE TO PATIENT SIZE, THIS INCREASED COMPLEXITY AND DIFFICULTY OF SURGICAL PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Scar Tissue

    MAUDE report 21426837 ↗
  • InjuryJun 19, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED A RIGHT KNEE SURGICAL PROCEDURE APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS 2 MONTHS POST INITIAL IMPLANT. PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: FAILED RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY SECONDARY TO PREMATURE POLYETHYLENE WEAR FROM A RECALLED POLYETHYLENE INSERT AND ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT. REVISION RIGHT. TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY OF FEMORAL, TIBIAL, AND PATELLAR COMPONENTS. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO COMPETITOR'S IMPLANTS. INFECTION WORK-UP WAS NEGATIVE. THERE WAS SOME EARLY POLYETHYLENE SYNOVITIS, BUT NO SIGNS OF INFECTION OR PURULENCE. THERE WAS EARLY WEAR OF THE PATELLAR BUTTON ON THE LATERAL FACET WITH FLATTENING, IT WAS EXCHANGED. ON GROSS INSPECTION OF THE TIBIAL INSERT, THERE WERE NO OBVIOUS SIGNS OF SIGNIFICANT WEAR, THERE WERE A COUPLE OF AREAS OF SOME PINNING. THERE WAS FAILURE OF BONY INGROWTH FOR THE FEMORAL COMPONENT, IT WAS REMOVED. TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS REMOVED. TILE PATIENT WAS AWOKEN FROM ANESTHESIA AND TRANSFERRED TO THE RECOVERY ROOM IN STABLE CONDITION. NO COMPLICATIONS. DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED. NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION REPORTED. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE

    Patient problems: Emotional Changes; Pain; Scar Tissue; Swelling/ Edema; Synovitis

    MAUDE report 19567727 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2022Packaging Problem; Packaging Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SET UP, THE SURRAN WRAPPED FEMORAL IMPLANT PACKAGE WAS OPENED. THE TAMPER EVIDENT TAB WAS STILL INTACT WITH NO SIGNS OF TAMPERING. THE TAB WAS OPENED. THE FEMORAL IMPLANT REMOVED. WHILE STARTING TO PEEL BACK TO EXPOSE THE STERILE CONTENTS, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE PAPER WAS NOT FULLY SEALED AND ALREADY LOOSE AND OPEN. THE STERILE CONTENT ALSO HAD A PACKAGING ISSUE WHERE THE SEAL BETWEEN THE PAPER AND THE PLASTIC PEEL PART WAS SEEN FOLDED BACK AND NOT SEALED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15972086 ↗
  • InjuryJun 13, 2022Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY FIVE MONTHS POST INITIAL RIGHT TKA, THE 66 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN AND HAD A REVISION DUE TO LOOSE FEMUR. SURGEON USED A DEVICE FROM ANOTHER COMPANY FOR REVISION. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. SALES REP WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN PHOTOS/X-RAYS. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION AS HOSPITAL WILL NOT RELEASE THE IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 14680237 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patello/Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Porous, Coated, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patello/Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Porous, Coated, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page