Skip to content

Truliant 02-020-14-0330Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Truliant CR Porous Femoral · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Truliant (414)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862315113), received between Sep 29, 2022 and Jul 10, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Discomfort1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 10, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON THE RIGHT SIDE. 4 YEARS FOLLOWING, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED LIMITED RANGE OF MOTION WITH PAIN IN THE RIGHT TKA, SUBJECT IMPACTED THE KNEE 2 MONTHS PRIOR AND UNDERWENT PHYSICAL THERAPY REHABILITATION. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT HAS NOW EXPERIENCED ASEPTIC FEMORAL LOOSENING FOUND ON THE RADIOGRAPHS. PATIENT DEIGNS PAIN BUT INDICATES THAT ROM IS MORE OF A CONCERN; AT THIS VISIT WAS 0-85 DEGREES FLEXION. AS A RESULT, APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS AFTER INITIAL REPLACEMENT, THE PATIENT IS AGAIN UNDERGOING PHYSICAL THERAPY REHABILITATION. NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain

    MAUDE report 22471685 ↗
  • InjuryNov 4, 2022Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA A LEGAL NOTIFICATION THAT A 70 YO FEMALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED WITH EXACTECH TRULIANT TOTAL KNEE SYSTEM ON (B)(6) 2021, WAS SEEN POSTOPERATIVELY IN (B)(6) 2021 WITH COMPLAINTS OF ONGOING PAIN IN HER KNEE, ESPECIALLY DURING AND FOLLOWING PHYSICAL THERAPY. AT THAT TIME, X-RAYS SHOWED QUESTIONABLE INGROWTH IN THE FEMORAL COMPONENT. THE PATIENT¿S ORTHOPEDIST DIRECTED HER TO STOP THE PHYSICAL THERAPY TO SEE IF THE BONE MIGHT HEAL AND RETURN FOR NEW X-RAYS IN A FEW WEEKS. IN (B)(6) 2022 DURING ANOTHER APPOINTMENT WITH HER SURGEON. X-RAYS SHOWED A FAILURE OF INGROWTH OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND THE DOCTOR INFORMED HER SHE WOULD NEED TO HAVE REVISION SURGERY IN CONNECTION WITH BOTH THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS. REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 10 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT NOW WALKS WITH A CANE AND HAS BEEN ABLE TO RESUME MOST OF HER ACTIVITIES, DESPITE A CONTINUING LIMP. SHE NO LONGER NEEDS TO ATTEND PHYSICAL THERAPY AND HAS BEEN DISCHARGED BY THE THERAPIST.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Discomfort; Pain

    MAUDE report 15728316 ↗
  • InjurySep 29, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT ID: (B)(6). IT WAS REPORTED THAT A FEMALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2021, PRESENTED TO THE CLINIC WITH PAIN AND INSTABILITY. THE MECHANICAL CUTS APPEARED GOOD ON X-RAY BUT THE PATIENTS MCL APPEARED TO BE NOT FUNCTIONING WITH NOTABLE GAPPING MEDIALLY. A REVISION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. LATERAL RELEASES AND THICKER POLY DID NOT SOLVE THE MID FLEXION INSTABILITY, SO THE PREVIOUS POROUS FEMUR WAS CONVERTED TO A STEMMED CC FEMUR WITH A CC INSERT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A SLIGHT CRACK OF THE MEDIAL CONDYLE WAS NOTED DURING IMPACTION OF THE FEMUR, WHICH OCCURRED DURING IMPACTION AND ADJUSTING ROTATION. THE NEW IMPLANTS WERE STABLE WITH GOOD ROM AND THE INSTABILITY WAS SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER PER THE SURGEON. THE EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. PRODUCT NOT RETURNING - EXPLANTS NOT AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 15502468 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page