Truliant 02-020-14-0330Recalls & reported problems
Exactech, Inc. · Truliant CR Porous Femoral · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Truliant (414)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862315113), received between Sep 29, 2022 and Jul 10, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Naturally Worn1
Patient problems
- Pain2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Aseptic loosening1
- Discomfort1
- Implant Pain1
- Loss of Range of Motion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 10, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON THE RIGHT SIDE. 4 YEARS FOLLOWING, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED LIMITED RANGE OF MOTION WITH PAIN IN THE RIGHT TKA, SUBJECT IMPACTED THE KNEE 2 MONTHS PRIOR AND UNDERWENT PHYSICAL THERAPY REHABILITATION. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT HAS NOW EXPERIENCED ASEPTIC FEMORAL LOOSENING FOUND ON THE RADIOGRAPHS. PATIENT DEIGNS PAIN BUT INDICATES THAT ROM IS MORE OF A CONCERN; AT THIS VISIT WAS 0-85 DEGREES FLEXION. AS A RESULT, APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS AFTER INITIAL REPLACEMENT, THE PATIENT IS AGAIN UNDERGOING PHYSICAL THERAPY REHABILITATION. NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain
MAUDE report 22471685 ↗InjuryNov 4, 2022Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Naturally Worn; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED VIA A LEGAL NOTIFICATION THAT A 70 YO FEMALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED WITH EXACTECH TRULIANT TOTAL KNEE SYSTEM ON (B)(6) 2021, WAS SEEN POSTOPERATIVELY IN (B)(6) 2021 WITH COMPLAINTS OF ONGOING PAIN IN HER KNEE, ESPECIALLY DURING AND FOLLOWING PHYSICAL THERAPY. AT THAT TIME, X-RAYS SHOWED QUESTIONABLE INGROWTH IN THE FEMORAL COMPONENT. THE PATIENT¿S ORTHOPEDIST DIRECTED HER TO STOP THE PHYSICAL THERAPY TO SEE IF THE BONE MIGHT HEAL AND RETURN FOR NEW X-RAYS IN A FEW WEEKS. IN (B)(6) 2022 DURING ANOTHER APPOINTMENT WITH HER SURGEON. X-RAYS SHOWED A FAILURE OF INGROWTH OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND THE DOCTOR INFORMED HER SHE WOULD NEED TO HAVE REVISION SURGERY IN CONNECTION WITH BOTH THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS. REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 10 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT NOW WALKS WITH A CANE AND HAS BEEN ABLE TO RESUME MOST OF HER ACTIVITIES, DESPITE A CONTINUING LIMP. SHE NO LONGER NEEDS TO ATTEND PHYSICAL THERAPY AND HAS BEEN DISCHARGED BY THE THERAPIST.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Discomfort; Pain
MAUDE report 15728316 ↗InjurySep 29, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT ID: (B)(6). IT WAS REPORTED THAT A FEMALE PATIENT, INITIAL RIGHT KNEE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2021, PRESENTED TO THE CLINIC WITH PAIN AND INSTABILITY. THE MECHANICAL CUTS APPEARED GOOD ON X-RAY BUT THE PATIENTS MCL APPEARED TO BE NOT FUNCTIONING WITH NOTABLE GAPPING MEDIALLY. A REVISION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE. LATERAL RELEASES AND THICKER POLY DID NOT SOLVE THE MID FLEXION INSTABILITY, SO THE PREVIOUS POROUS FEMUR WAS CONVERTED TO A STEMMED CC FEMUR WITH A CC INSERT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A SLIGHT CRACK OF THE MEDIAL CONDYLE WAS NOTED DURING IMPACTION OF THE FEMUR, WHICH OCCURRED DURING IMPACTION AND ADJUSTING ROTATION. THE NEW IMPLANTS WERE STABLE WITH GOOD ROM AND THE INSTABILITY WAS SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER PER THE SURGEON. THE EXPLANTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. PRODUCT NOT RETURNING - EXPLANTS NOT AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 15502468 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page