Skip to content

Equinoxe 320-31-40Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Glenosphere · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Equinoxe (305)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862534972), received between Mar 30, 2022 and Mar 19, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 2 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Naturally Worn2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant3
  • Metal Related Pathology2
  • Osteolysis2
  • Pain2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Constipation1
  • Inflammation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 19, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED IN A CLINICAL STUDY THAT THE PATIENT PREVIOUSLY UNDERWENT AN INITIAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED ASEPTIC GLENOID LOOSENING AND PAIN WITHOUT A KNOWN INCITING EVENT. NO MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION HAS BEEN UNDERTAKEN AT THIS TIME, AND THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY UNDER OBSERVATION. THE DEVICE REMAINS IMPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Pain

    MAUDE report 24640738 ↗
  • InjuryJun 16, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS PATIENT'S RIGHT SHOULDER WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS POST INITIAL OPERATION. THE REVISION WAS DUE TO AN INFECTION. SURGEON EXCHANGED THE LINER AND GLENOSPHERE. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22216089 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION OF A RIGHT TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT 4 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST-OP DUE TO PAIN, POLY WEAR, AND INFECTION WITH CONTINUED TREATMENT WITH ANTIBIOTICS FOR 6 MONTHS POST-OP (CAPTURED ON A SEPARATE REPORT). SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ASPIRATION OF THE SHOULDER APPROXIMATELY 10 MONTHS AFTER THE REVISION PROCEDURE FOR CONTINUED PAIN AND FLUID ACCUMULATION (CAPTURED ON A SEPARATE REPORT). FOLLOWING THE ASPIRATION, CONTINUED PAIN WAS REPORTED AND AN MRI WAS OBTAINED WHICH SHOWED INFLAMMATION AROUND THE IMPLANT. APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH LATER, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION OF THE RIGHT TOTAL SHOULDER. INTRAOPERATIVELY, SEROSANGUINEOUS FLUID WAS NOTED AND INTRAOPERATIVE CULTURES WERE ALL NEGATIVE. FURTHER, THE SURGICAL PATHOLOGY REPORT NOTED A SOFT TISSUE REACTION TO POLYETHYLENE PARTICULATE DEBRIS. THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A COMPETITOR SYSTEM. THE PATIENT WAS FOLLOWED BY THE PAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICE POST-OPERATIVELY AND WAS DISCHARGED HOME APPROXIMATELY 7 DAYS LATER. THE PATIENT WAS NOTED TO BE DOING WELL AT HIS 1 WEEK POST-OPERATIVE VISIT.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Joint effusion; Metal Related Pathology; Muscle/Tendon Damage; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 22195647 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    THIS EVENT WAS RECEIVED THROUGH MEDWATCH REPORT # (B)(4). PATIENT UNDERWENT RIGHT REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT AND RIGHT SHOULDER BICEPS TENODESIS FOR RIGHT SHOULDER ROTATOR CUFF TEAR ARTHROPATHY AND BICEPS TENOSYNOVITIS ON (B)(6) 2021. HE WAS DISCHARGED HOME ON (B)(6) 2021. THE PATIENT WAS PROGRESSING WITH RECOVERY AND DOING WELL AS OF 04-MAY-2021. HE CAME FOR AN OFFICE VISIT ON 09-JAN-2024 (LAST VISIT WAS 04- MAY-2021), AT WHICH TIME THE PATIENT REPORTED OVER THE PAST YEAR OR SO, SOME CLICKING AND DECREASE IN HIS FUNCTION. 09-JAN-2024 X-RAYS OF THE RIGHT SHOULDER WERE REVIEWED, DEMONSTRATING REVERSE TSA IN PLACE, WITH SOME OSTEOLYSIS AROUND THE GLENOID, BUT NO OBVIOUS GROSS LOOSENING OF THE BASEPLATE; THERE APPEARED TO BE DISPLACEMENT OF THE POLYETHYLENE LINER. DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP INCLUDING CT SCAN, CBC, ESR, CRP, AND AN ASPIRATION WERE RECOMMENDED. THE CULTURES WERE NEGATIVE AND CT CONFIRMED FAILURE OF THE POLYETHYLENE LINER WITH DISSOCIATION. THE PATIENT WAS INDICATED FOR REVISION TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY. THE PATIENT OPTED TO HAVE THE REVISION SURGERY CLOSER TO WHERE HE LIVES IN ANOTHER STATE. ON (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION OF FAILED REVERSE ARTHROPLASTY,

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Failure of Implant; Metal Related Pathology; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 19521955 ↗
  • InjuryOct 5, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR POST OP THE INITIAL LEFT TSA, THIS 71 Y/O FEMALE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO STATING SHOULDER FEELING LIKE IT WAS LOOSE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ISSUED DURING THE SURGICAL REVISION. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED AND DEEMED TO BE STABLE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY. NEW INFORMATION ON 27 SEP 2022: THE PATIENT HAD JOINT LAXITY. NO COMPONENTS WERE LOOSE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 15546312 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2022Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    AS REPORTED, DURING LEFT SHOULDER REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON REMOVED A LOOSE BODY/OSTEOPHYTE. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED. THE DEVICE IS NOT RETURNING DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 15514788 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AS REPORTED, POST OP SHOULDER SURGERY, THIS (B)(6) PATIENT REPORTED INSTABILITY AND SUBLUXATION. THE PATIENT HAS HAD ROUGHLY 6 SUBLUXATION EPISODES. THE CASE REPORT FORM INDICATES THIS EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO DEVICES AND DEFINITELY NOT RELATED TO PROCEDURE. THIS EVENT REPORT WAS RECEIVED THROUGH CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITIES. REVISION HAS NOT OCCURRED, CONTINUING DELTOID STRENGTHENING EXERCISES. OUTCOME IS CONTINUING.

    Patient problems: Constipation

    MAUDE report 13949248 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page