Skip to content

Equinoxe 310-61-47Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Equinoxe (305)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862537119), received between Apr 25, 2024 and Feb 21, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Lack of Effect1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Discomfort1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Pain1
  • Subluxation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 21, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS PATIENT'S RIGHT SHOULDER WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 3 YEARS POST INITIAL OPERATION. PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN AND HAD A FAILED IMPLANT. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Pain; Subluxation

    MAUDE report 21435972 ↗
  • InjuryApr 25, 2024Mechanical Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Lack of Effect; Mechanical Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Lack of Effect

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY FOUR MONTHS POST INITIAL RIGHT TSA, THE 63 Y/O MALE HAD A REVISION TO REMOVE EXISTING STEMLESS HUMERAL IMPLANTS AND REVISE TO STEMMED HUMERAL IMPLANT AND ANATOMIC GLENOID COMPONENT. THE PATIENT HAD THE STEMLESS HUMERAL HEAD AND CAGE REMOVED AND AN EQUINOXE HUMERAL STEM WAS IMPLANTED ALONG WITH A LASER CAGE GLENOID. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. SALES REP WAS UNABLE TO OBTAIN PHOTO/X-RAYS. THE DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION DUE TO HOSPITAL RETAINS THE EXPLANTED PRODUCTS.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Failure of Implant; Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 19185042 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained devices

All Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page