Skip to content

Equinoxe 310-61-50Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Equinoxe (305)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862537126), received between Nov 22, 2023 and Mar 31, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Arthropathy1
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 31, 2026Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 58 YO MALE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LEFT PRIMARY TSA, UNDERWENT A REVISION TO REMOVE A STEMLESS PRIMARY TSA AND LASER CAGE GLENOID. THE SURGEON POINTED OUT IT WAS APPARENT THAT THE OVERHANG OF THE HEAD IMPLANT CONTRIBUTED TO THE FAILURE OF THE SUBSCAPULARIS. ONCE THE HEAD AND HUMERAL COMPONENT WERE REMOVED, THEY MOVED TO THE GLENOID WHERE THE LASER CAGE GLENOID WAS REMOVED WITH AN OSTEOTOME. THE CENTRAL PEG AND INFERIOR PEGS WERE EXPLANTED BUT THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE THE SUPERIOR PEG WITHOUT CAUSING TOO MUCH DAMAGE, SO IT WAS LEFT IN. AN ABX SHOULDER SPACER WAS REIMPLANTED. THERE WERE NO DEVICE BREAKAGES OR SURGICAL DELAYS DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. AN X-RAY WAS PROVIDED. THE HEAD IMPLANT APPEARS TO BE DISLOCATED IN THE IMAGING. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THE HOSPITAL WILL NOT RELEASE THEM. DEVICE IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION. THIS IS 1 OF 2 REPORTS FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Arthropathy

    MAUDE report 24738237 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED BY THE EQUINOXE SHOULDER STUDY, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL TSA ON (B)(6) 2020. THE PATIENT PRESENTED ON (B)(6) 2020 WITH COMPLAINS OF PERSISTING STIFFNESS AND DISCOMFORT AFTER ORIGINAL ARTHROPLASTY - REVISED DONE ON (B)(6) 2020. THE CASE REPORT FORM INDICATES THAT THIS EVENT IS DEFINITELY NOT RELATED TO DEVICE AND DEFINITELY RELATED TO PROCEDURE. OUTCOME IS RESOLVED ON (B)(6) 2020.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18196986 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained devices

All Prosthesis, Total Anatomic Shoulder, Uncemented Metaphyseal Humeral Stem With No Diaphyseal Incursion, Semi-Constrained devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page