Skip to content

Equinoxe 320-06-38Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862563699), received between Feb 16, 2022 and Aug 8, 2025 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Naturally Worn2
  • Fracture1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Joint Dislocation3
  • Metal Related Pathology2
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Bacterial Infection1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 8, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT ON THE RIGHT SIDE AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH EXACTECH DEVICES. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A DISLOCATION. PATIENT HAD SPINE SURGERY AND HAS HAD SHOULDER PAIN SINCE. PHYSICAL THERAPY WAS ORDERED FOR STRENGTHENING EXERCISES. SHOULDER BECAME EASILY AGGRAVATED, SO CT ORDERED. CT COMPLETED SHOWING DISLOCATION. X-RAYS DONE CONFIRMING DISLOCATION W/ POSSIBLE DISSOCIATION OF POLYETHYLENE LINER FROM HUMERAL TRAY DURING PATIENT OFFICE VISIT. AS A RESULT, APPROXIMATELY 1 AFTER INITIAL REPLACEMENT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT SHOULDER REVISION. NO FURTHER IMPACT TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Joint Dislocation; Metal Related Pathology; Solid Tumor

    MAUDE report 22756482 ↗
  • InjuryJun 10, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED A 68 YO MALE PATIENT, WHO HAD A LEFT SHOULDER IMPLANTED, UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE. IT APPEARED THE HUMERAL LINER WAS DISSOCIATED FROM THE HUMERAL PLATE. THE SURGEON BELIEVED THAT THE POLY HAD BEEN DISSOCIATED FOR QUITE SOME TIME PER THE X-RAYS. THE PATIENT HAD SIGNIFICANT METALLOSIS THROUGHOUT THE JOINT. BOTH THE HUMERAL STEM AND GLENOID BASEPLATE WERE LOOSE. THEY WERE REMOVED AND AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER WAS IMPLANTED. PATIENT WILL BE REVISED AT A LATER DATE WITH A CUSTOM GLENOID. THERE WERE NO DEVICE BREAKAGES OR SURGICAL DELAYS DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. X-RAYS WERE PROVIDED. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY. DEVICE IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION. THIS IS 1 OF 5 REPORTS FOR THIS EVENT. THIS IS THE 2ND OF 2 EVENTS FOR THIS PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 22179230 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH POST INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY (TSA), THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION OF THE PROSTHESIS DUE TO DISLOCATION. THE PATIENT WAS WHEELCHAIR-BOUND AND WITHIN THE FIRST COUPLE WEEKS AFTER IMPLANT, REACHED OVER A CHAIR AND DISLOCATED THE PROSTHESIS. THE SURGEON PROCEEDED TO REVISE THE PATIENT TO LARGER AND CONSTRAINED IMPLANTS. THE GLENOSPHERE, LOCKING SCREW, AND LINER WERE SWAPPED OUT. THE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION OF APPROXIMATELY 30-45 MINUTES IN RELATION TO THE NEED FOR REVISION SURGERY DUE TO THE DISLOCATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 20822738 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS POST INITIAL LEFT TSA, THE 67 MALE Y/O PATIENT HAD A SINGLE STAGE REVISION FOR INFECTION. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO EXACTECH DEVICES. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF THE DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19369608 ↗
  • InjuryOct 4, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT TSA ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. A CONVERSION OF ANATOMIC TO REVERSE OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2023. THERE WAS NO REPORTED SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17873791 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 3, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT HAD AN INITIAL LEFT TSA ON (B)(6) 2022. THE STEM, POLY AND TRAY WERE REVISED ON (B)(6) 2023 DUE TO TOTAL SHOULDER DISLOCATION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED BREAKAGE OF DEVICES OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 16293307 ↗
  • InjuryJan 18, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 65 YO MALE PATIENT, HAD AN INITIAL RIGHT SHOULDER IMPLANTED ON (B)(6)2021, AND THEN UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022, APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR 4 MONTHS POST THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT HAD A SUSPECTED INFECTION. I&D WAS DONE AND LINER AND GLENOSPHERE WERE REPLACED. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO EXACTECH DEVICES. THERE WAS NO BREAKAGE OF DEVICE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION DURING THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. NO OTHER PATIENT INFORMATION/MEDICAL HISTORY REPORTED. THE DEVICES WILL NOT TO BE RETURNED DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16195962 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 16, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    A REPORTED, DURING THE PRIMARY IMPLANT PROCEDURE OF THE R SHOULDER, THIS (B)(6) FEMALE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A CORACOID TIP FRACTURE. SURGEON PERFORMED A SUTURE FIXATION. GPS WAS USED DURING THIS CASE, HOWEVER IT IS UNKNOWN WHERE THE GPS PATIENT TRACKER WAS ATTACHED. THE CASE REPORT FORM INDICATES THIS EVENT IS DEFINITELY RELATED TO DEVICES AND/OR PROCEDURE. THIS EVENT REPORT WAS RECEIVED THROUGH CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITIES.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 13541778 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.