Skip to content

Equinoxe 320-08-42Recalls & reported problems

Exactech, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Equinoxe (305)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10885862563729), received between Jul 11, 2024 and Oct 30, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 30, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AND EIGHT MONTHS POST TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY (TSA), THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION OF THE RIGHT HYBRID REVERSE SHOULDER DUE TO THE GLENOSPHERE AND GLENOSPHERE LOCKING SCREW BACKING OUT AWAY FROM A WELL FIXED REVERSE BASEPLATE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN AN ATV ACCIDENT THAT MAY HAVE AFFECTED THE PROSTHESIS. THE SURGEON REPLACED THE GLENOSPHERE AND GLENOSPHERE LOCKING SCREW. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DEVICE BREAKAGE OR SURGICAL DELAY/PROLONGATION. THE PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20569429 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 12 MONTHS AFTER A LEFT TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS PAIN AND LOOSENING. THE SURGEON REMOVED A LOOSE EQUINOXE GLENOID BASEPLATE AND 42+4 GLENOSPHERE. HE REPLACED THEM WITH A COMPETITOR¿S DEVICES. THERE WAS NO REPORTED SURGICAL DELAY OR BREAKAGE OF A DEVICE. PATIENT WAS LAST KNOWN TO BE IN STABLE CONDITION FOLLOWING THE EVENT. X-RAYS WERE UNABLE TO BE OBTAINED. THE EXPLANTED DEVICES ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THEY WERE SENT TO SPD. DEVICE IMAGES WERE PROVIDED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 19726545 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page