Skip to content

CEREGLIDE NIC57137URecalls & reported problems

Cerenovus, Inc. · CEREGLIDE 57 · Class 2

All models of CEREGLIDE (6)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10886704086550), received between Dec 18, 2025 and Dec 18, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • Thromboembolism1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    THE HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL REPORTED THAT DURING A THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE (AIS) TARGETING AN OCCLUSION IN THE A2 SEGMENT OF THE RIGHT ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY (ACA), A CEREBASE, A 137 CM CEREGLIDE 57 CATHETER (NIC57137U / 31766662), AN ARISTOTLE® 18 GUIDEWIRE (SCIENTIA VASCULAR) WERE USED TO NAVIGATE TO THE CLOT FACE. AFTER ONE (1) PASS, A MAJORITY OF THE CLOT WAS REMOVED BUT SOME CLOT HAD MIGRATED DISTAL INTO THE A3 SEGMENT. THE CEREGLIDE 57 CATHETER WAS THEN TRACKED UP AGAIN, BUT IT WAS UNABLE TO REACH THE DISTAL CLOT AND A 160CM CEREGLIDE 42 CATHETER (NIC42160U / 31766628) WAS USED TO REACH THE CLOT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE ATTEMPT TO INSIDER THE CEREGLIDE 42 INTO THE CEREGLIDE 57, THE CEREGLIDE 42 WAS UNABLE TO TRAVERSE PAST THE HUB OF THE CEREGLIDE 57. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS A SMALL KINK IN THE CEREGLIDE 57 CATHETER, BUT IT WAS MUCH MORE DISTAL TO THE HUB OF THE DEVICE, AND IT WAS NOT THE CAUSE OF THE CEREGLIDE 42 CATHETER NOT FITTING INTO THE CEREGLIDE 57 CATHETER. AFTER MANY UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS OF TRYING TO PUT THE CEREGLIDE 42 INTO THE CEREGLIDE 57, THE PHYSICIAN PULLED THE CEREGLIDE 57 OUT AND TRAVERSED UP TO THE CLOT USING

    Patient problems: Thromboembolism

    MAUDE report 23843470 ↗

Other CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER devices

All CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page