PERCANNULA 222274Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · PERCANNULA System 4.0mm · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10886705020263), received between Sep 24, 2018 and Sep 24, 2018 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Twisted/Bent” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 24, 2018Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent
THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR THE SAME EVENT. IT WAS REPORTED BY THE AFFILIATE IN THE (B)(6) THAT DURING A PARTIAL CUFF TEAR REPAIR, THE WHEN INSERTING THE ANCHOR HALF WAY INTO THE BONE, IT LOOKED LIKE THE ANCHOR BROKE. BUT THE OUTER SHAFT OF THE PERCANULE SYSTEM SHOW A DENT ON ONE SITE. WHICH MAY LEAD TO THINK IT CUT THE ANCHOR OFF. YOU CAN ALSO SEE THAT ON THE EDGE WERE THE ANCHOR BROKE OF/ HAS BEEN CUT OFF. LUCKILY THE PART OF THE ANCHOR WHICH GOT INTO THE BONE, HELD AND SO THE DOCTOR COULD FINISH THE REPAIR. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROXIMAL PART WAS BEING SENT BACK (WITH CORTICAL TREADS) AS THE DISTAL PART WITH THE SUTURES REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR SEEMED TO BE CUT OFF (BY THE OUTER SHAFT OF THE PERCANULA SYSTEM) BETWEEN THE CORTICAL AND CANCELLOUS TREADS. THE SURGEON WAS SATISFIED ENOUGH TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE WITH IT AND WITH THE REMAINING DISTAL PART OF THE ANCHOR, CAUSE IT STILL HAD SOME FIXATION THIS FAILURE DID NOT EXTEND THE PROCEDURE TIME GREATER THAN 30 MINUTES BECAUSE HE FINISHED THE PROCEDURE WITH THE FIRST ANCHOR (WHICH PARTIALLY REMAINED IN THE PATIENTS BONE). THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT REPORTED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES, MEDICAL INTER
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7901741 ↗
Other CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY devices
- EXPEDIUM 279712580Medos International Sàrl · CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY69 reports
- AESCULAP MD610Aesculap, Inc. · CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY1 recall0 reports
- ENDOPATH TT012Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC · CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY47 reports
- NA 03.168.013Synthes GmbH · CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY37 reports
- NA 214120Medos International Sàrl · CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY28 reports
- Monoject 8881540111Cardinal Health, Inc. · CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY19 reports
- MOSS 279712500Depuy Spine, LLC · CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY12 reports
- Monoject 8881540133Cardinal Health, Inc. · CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY10 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page