Skip to content

WECK IPN914218Recalls & reported problems

Teleflex Incorporated · WECK EFx Shield Port Site Closure System · Class 1

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 14026704645272), received between Apr 21, 2021 and Dec 22, 2025 — classified as 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break6
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions9

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 22, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT "SHIELD CLOSURE DEVICE PREPPED AS NORMAL AND USED FOR FASCIAL CLOSURE OF A PATIENT. WHILE INTO ABDOMEN, IT BROKE, BUT NOT APART. SHIELD WAS INTACT AND REMOVED CAREFULLY. NO HARM TO PATIENT". ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATES THAT "THE SHIELD BROKE INSIDE THE ABDOMEN, BUT NOT APART-THIS OCCURRED DURING THE WING FIXTURE PHASE. THE SHIELD WAS PROPERLY REMOVED WITHOUT ANY PARTS FALLING OFF IT". ANOTHER SHIELD DEVICE WAS OPENED AND USED AS INTENDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23871405 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE "SHIELD BROKE ON A FEMALE PATIENT. THE SHIELD WING CAME APART. [THE DOCTOR] ASSURES THE PATIENT WAS OK AND THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS. HE SAID EVERYTHING WAS FINE. HE JUST WANTED TO KNOW WHAT HE DID TO BREAK THE PRODUCT". AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT THE CUSTOMER HAS NOT RETURNED OUR REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS RECEIVED, THE COMPLAINT FILE WILL BE UPDATED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17596998 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 2, 2021Break; Break

    BROKE WHEN INSERTING INTO THE FASCIA. NO PATIENT INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: THE SHIELD PART SNAPPED WHEN HE INSERTED INTO THE FASCIA. PROBABLY TOO HARD AND GOT CAUGHT. NOTHING FELL INTO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12736588 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 30, 2021Break; Break

    A PORTION OF ONE SIDE OF THE WING OF THE EFX SHIELD BROKE OFF WHILE PULLING THE PRODUCT OUT OF THE DEFECT. THE PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED TO MY KNOWLEDGE, NOR HARMED IN ANY WAY. NOT SURE WHY THIS HAPPENED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12091467 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 23, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE PLASTIC "V" AT THE BOTTOM PF THE DEVICE BECAME DETACHED WHILE INSIDE OF PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: YES, IT DID FALL INSIDE THE PATIENT BUT WAS RETRIEVED AT THE TIME WITHOUT INCIDENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12049557 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 17, 2021Break; Break

    SIDE OF WING BROKE WHILE IN PATIENT. NO PATIENT INJURY OR CONSEQUENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12017677 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2021Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    I WANTED TO BRING IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE APPROPRIATE TEAM AN ISSUE WE EXPERIENCED LAST NIGHT DURING A TRIAL WITH PRODUCT NUMBER EFX002 AND ACCOUNT 137700. I PROPERLY IN-SERVICED THE ACCOUNT, THE SURGEON, SCRUB TECH AND FIRST ASSIST IN LOADING AND USING THE EFX002 WECK SHIELD FASCIAL CLOSURE DEVICE. UPON ENTERING THE DEVICE INTO THE PATIENT DEFECT, THE SUTURE RETRIEVER WENT DOWN THE FIRST HOLE ON THE SIDE TO RETRIEVE THE SUTURE WHICH WAS DONE SUCCESSFULLY. WHEN THE USER WENT DOWN THE SECOND HOLE TO RETRIEVE THE SECOND PART OF THE SUTURE, THEY WERE EXPERIENCING ISSUES WITH RETRIEVING THE SUTURE. THE SUTURE RETRIEVER BENT WHERE THE METAL SHARP MEETS THE PLASTIC. I HAVE ATTACHED PICTURES AND VIDEOS. I DO NOT HAVE THE PRODUCT CODE TO IDENTIFY THE ACTUAL BATCH OR ANY SPECIFIC INFORMATION BUT I WANTED TO BRING TO THE THE ATTENTION OF OUR CLAIMS TEAM THAT THE DEVICE WAS FAULTY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11819455 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2021Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    PART OF PLASTIC SPLIT DETACHED FROM SIDE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11706721 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2021Break; Break

    DURING SECOND DEPLOYMENT ONE OF THE WINGS BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. OCCURRENCE DID NOT CHANGE OUTCOME. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR CONSEQUENCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11700797 ↗

Other INSTRUMENT, LIGATURE PASSING AND KNOT TYING devices

All INSTRUMENT, LIGATURE PASSING AND KNOT TYING devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.