Skip to content

Olympus WA47786ARecalls & reported problems

OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Versapoint Bipolar Electrode Resectoscopic - 2.5 mm Angled Loop Resecting · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
14
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 14042761086254), received between May 28, 2021 and Mar 10, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (8 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break8
  • Flare or Flash4
  • Fracture3
  • Material Fragmentation3
  • Mechanical Problem3
  • Activation Problem2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
  • Foreign Body In Patient4
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 10, 2026Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE CUSTOMER.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24558382 ↗
  • InjuryMar 5, 2025Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC RESECTION OF A TROPHOBLASTIC RETENTION, THE LOOP OF THE RESECTION DEVICE BROKE. IT BECAME STUCK IN THE RETENTION AND WAS RECOVERED UNDER HYSTEROSCOPY AFTER A LONG SEARCH. THE DURATION OF THE OPERATION WAS EXTENDED, WITH NO REPORTS OF FURTHER PATIENT INJURY OR HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21526752 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 7, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THE LOOP OF THE ENDOSCOPIC ELECTROSURGICAL ELECTRODE SNAPPED WHILE BEING INSERTED INTO THE RESECTION OPENING PRIOR TO INSERTING THE DEVICE INTO THE PATIENT. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A RESECTION PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19489507 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS ADDITIONALLY REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS A HYSTEROSCOPY AND THAT THE PATIENT HAD A GOOD POST SURGICAL RECOVERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17090368 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2023Break; Break

    A USER FACILITY REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THAT WHILE USING THE VERSAPOINT BIPOLAR ELECTRODE RESECTOSCOPIC - 2.5 MM ANGLED LOOP, RESECTING, THE DISTAL END OF THE LOOP BROKE IN THE PATIENT 30 MINUTES INTO THE PROCEDURE. THE LOOP WAS NOT FOUND. THE PROCEDURE CONTINUED WITH A SECOND LOOP, WHICH ALSO BROKE. THE PROCEDURE WAS THEN ABANDONED/INTERRUPTED. THE PATIENT WAS GIVEN PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS DUE TO THE POTENTIAL INFECTION RISK. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT FEEL THERE WAS A RISK OF UTERINE PERFORATION OR ANY OTHER SERIOUS INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NOT PROVIDED. THIS EVENT REQUIRES TWO REPORTS FOR THE TWO BROKEN LOOPS. PATIENT IDENTIFIER'S (B)(6) AND (B)(6). THIS REPORT IS FOR (B)(6).

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17090241 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2023Flare or Flash; Flare or Flash

    A USER FACILITY REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THAT WHILE USING THE VERSAPOINT II ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR, NON-STERILE, REUSABLE FOR A MYOMECTOMY, FOUR (4) LOOPS WERE OPENED FOR THE CASE. THE FIRST LOOP BURNED THROUGH WHILE "ACTIVATED." THE SURGEON MANAGED TO GET THE METAL PART OUT (PRESUMABLY OUT OF THE BODY) BY CURETTING IT OUT AND WASHING IT OUT WITH SALINE UNDER PRESSURE. THREE OTHER LOOPS WERE OPENED, AND ALL BURNED THROUGH THE CENTER OF THE LOOP BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO USE THE LOOP TO CUT. A NEW GENERATOR WAS BROUGHT IN AND THE CASE WAS FINISHED WITH A LOOP WITHOUT ANY FURTHER PROBLEMS. THE FIRST GENERATOR HAD BEEN SERVICED 3 WEEKS PRIOR TO THE CASE. HOWEVER, WHEN THE TECHNICIAN WENT OUT TO THE FACILITY THE DAY AFTER THE ISSUES WERE NOTED, THE GENERATOR WAS ON THE MAXIMUM SETTING OF 200, WHICH WAS PAST THE DEFAULT SETTING OF 170. IT WAS STATED THAT THE STAFF HAD NOT CHANGED ANY SETTINGS AND THEY USE THE DEFAULT SETTING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THIS EVENT REQUIRES 5 REPORTS. (B)(6) IS FOR A VERSAPOINT BIPOLAR ELECTRODE RESECTOSCOPIC - 2.5 MM ANGLED LOOP, RESECTING (FIRST LOOP). (B)(6) IS FOR A VERSAPOINT BIPOLAR ELECTRODE RESECTOSCOPIC - 2.5 MM ANGLED LOOP, RESECTING (S

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16743612 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2023Flare or Flash; Flare or Flash

    HOLD SAC 4/21 A USER FACILITY REPORTED TO OLYMPUS, THAT WHILE USING THE VERSAPOINT II ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR, NON-STERILE, REUSABLE FOR A MYOMECTOMY. FOUR (4) LOOPS WERE OPENED FOR THE CASE. THE FIRST LOOP BURNED THROUGH WHILE "ACTIVATED". THE SURGEON MANAGED TO GET THE METAL PART OUT (PRESUMABLY OUT OF THE BODY) BY CURETTING IT OUT AND WASHING IT OUT WITH SALINE UNDER PRESSURE. THREE OTHER LOOPS WERE OPENED, AND ALL BURNED THROUGH THE CENTER OF THE LOOP BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO USE THE LOOP TO CUT. A NEW GENERATOR WAS BROUGHT IN AND THE CASE WAS FINISHED WITH A LOOP, WITHOUT ANY FURTHER PROBLEMS. THE FIRST GENERATOR HAD BEEN SERVICED 3 WEEKS PRIOR TO THE CASE. HOWEVER, WHEN THE TECHNICIAN WENT OUT TO THE FACILITY THE DAY AFTER THE ISSUES WERE NOTED, THE GENERATOR WAS ON THE MAXIMUM SETTING OF 200, WHICH WAS PAST THE DEFAULT SETTING OF 170. IT WAS STATED, THAT THE STAFF HAD NOT CHANGED ANY SETTINGS AND THEY USE THE DEFAULT SETTING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THIS EVENT REQUIRES 5 REPORTS: (B)(6) IS FOR A VERSAPOINT BIPOLAR ELECTRODE RESECTOSCOPIC - 2.5 MM ANGLED LOOP, RESECTING (FIRST LOOP). (B)(6) IS FOR A VERSAPOINT BIPOLAR ELECTRODE RESECTOSCOPIC - 2.5 MM ANGLED L

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16743483 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2023Flare or Flash; Flare or Flash

    A USER FACILITY REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THAT WHILE USING THE VERSAPOINT II ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR, NON-STERILE, REUSABLE FOR A MYOMECTOMY, FOUR (4) LOOPS WERE OPENED FOR THE CASE. THE FIRST LOOP BURNED THROUGH WHILE "ACTIVATED." THE SURGEON MANAGED TO GET THE METAL PART OUT (PRESUMABLY OUT OF THE BODY) BY CURETTING IT OUT AND WASHING IT OUT WITH SALINE UNDER PRESSURE. THREE OTHER LOOPS WERE OPENED, AND ALL BURNED THROUGH THE CENTER OF THE LOOP BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO USE THE LOOP TO CUT. A NEW GENERATOR WAS BROUGHT IN AND THE CASE WAS FINISHED WITH A LOOP WITHOUT ANY FURTHER PROBLEMS. THE FIRST GENERATOR HAD BEEN SERVICED 3 WEEKS PRIOR TO THE CASE. HOWEVER, WHEN THE TECHNICIAN WENT OUT TO THE FACILITY THE DAY AFTER THE ISSUES WERE NOTED, THE GENERATOR WAS ON THE MAXIMUM SETTING OF 200, WHICH WAS PAST THE DEFAULT SETTING OF 170. IT WAS STATED THAT THE STAFF HAD NOT CHANGED ANY SETTINGS AND THEY USE THE DEFAULT SETTING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THIS EVENT REQUIRES 5 REPORTS. (B)(6) IS FOR A VERSAPOINT BIPOLAR ELECTRODE RESECTOSCOPIC - 2.5 MM ANGLED LOOP, RESECTING (FIRST LOOP). (B)(6) IS FOR A VERSAPOINT BIPOLAR ELECTRODE RESECTOSCOPIC - 2.5 MM ANGLED LOOP, RESECTING (S

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16743409 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2023Flare or Flash; Flare or Flash

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED. THE INDICATION FOR THE MYOMECTOMY WAS A LARGE MYOMA FOUND ON SCAN. WHEN ASKED HOW LONG THE DELAY WAS, THE USER FACILITY STATED THAT THE OPERATION TOOK A TOTAL OF 145 MINUTES. THEY WERE UNABLE TO SAY EXACTLY HOW LONG THE DELAY WAS, BUT THAT IT WAS PROBABLY ABOUT 3 MINUTES PER EACH LOOP EXCHANGE. IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT SINCE IT WAS A LARGE FIBROID, IT DID A LONG TIME TO REMOVE IT. THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST KEPT THE PATIENT SEDATED AS PER NORMAL. THE PATIENT HAD NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AND WENT HOME THE NEXT MORNING.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16743291 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2022Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem

    OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE AT AN UNKNOWN DATE TWO YEARS AGO THE LOOP WIRE AT THE DISTAL END OF THE LOOP ELECTRODE BROKE OFF AND FELL INTO THE PATIENTS BODY CAVITY. THIS WAS NOT NOTICED AT THE TIME OF THE PROCEDURE BUT ONLY RECENTLY. AN X-RAY EXAMINATION CONFIRMED THAT THE LOOP WIRE IS STILL IN THE PATIENT AND A FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURE IS TO BE SCHEDULED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN FRAGMENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 15948284 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 9, 2022Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem

    OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC MYOMECTOMY PROCEDURE THE DISTAL END OF THE LOOP ELECTRODE BROKE OFF AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT'S UTERUS. HOWEVER, THE BROKEN FRAGMENT COULD BE RETRIEVED SUCCESSFULLY DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS SLIGHTLY EXTENDED BUT THE USER DID NOT CONSIDER THIS EXTENSION TO BE A SERIOUS DETERIORATION IN THE STATE OF HEALTH.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15757861 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2022Activation Problem; Activation Problem

    OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE 2 HF-RESECTION ELECTRODES CAUSED THE GENERATOR TO ISSUE ERROR MESSAGE E200. THE ERROR MESSAGE STILL OCCURRED AFTER THE HF-CABLE AND THE HF-GENERATOR HAD BEEN REPLACED. THE ERROR MESSAGE ONLY DISAPPEARED WHEN A THIRD HF-ELECTRODE WAS USED. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, HOWEVER THE FAILURE OF THE TWO ELECTRODES LED TO A DELAY OF THE PROCEDURE OF APPROX. 1 HOUR. THERE WAS REPORTEDLY NO IMPACT ON THE PATIENT OTHER THAN THE PROLONGED PROCEDURE TIME.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15445131 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2022Activation Problem; Activation Problem

    OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE 2 HF-RESECTION ELECTRODES CAUSED THE GENERATOR TO ISSUE ERROR MESSAGE E200. THE ERROR MESSAGE STILL OCCURRED AFTER THE HF-CABLE AND THE HF-GENERATOR HAD BEEN REPLACED. THE ERROR MESSAGE ONLY DISAPPEARED WHEN A THIRD HF-ELECTRODE WAS USED. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, HOWEVER THE FAILURE OF THE TWO ELECTRODES LED TO A DELAY OF THE PROCEDURE OF APPROX. 1 HOUR. THERE WAS REPORTEDLY NO IMPACT ON THE PATIENT OTHER THAN THE PROLONGED PROCEDURE TIME.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15444998 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 28, 2021Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem

    OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC TRANSCERVICAL RESECTION OF FIBROIDS (TCRF) PROCEDURE, THE LOOP WIRE AT THE DISTAL END OF THE HF-RESECTION ELECTRODE DETACHED. THE SURGEON TRIED TO RETRIEVE THE DETACHED PART, BUT WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE IT. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE DETACHED PART REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY SINCE IT COULD NOT BE FOUND WITH AN X-RAY EXAMINATION OF THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BUT THERE WAS NO REPORT ABOUT AN ADVERSE EVENT OR PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11899353 ↗

Other Coagulator-Cutter, Endoscopic, Unipolar (And Accessories) devices

All Coagulator-Cutter, Endoscopic, Unipolar (And Accessories) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page