Skip to content

Portex Z110N-14Recalls & reported problems

Icu Medical, Inc. · Class 1

All models of Portex (409)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 15019315058868), received between Nov 21, 2018 and Feb 6, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Component Missing1
  • Crack1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Fracture1
  • Obstruction of Flow1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Low Oxygen Saturation1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE PORT WAS TORN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21326557 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2024Crack; Fluid/Blood Leak; Crack; Fluid/Blood Leak

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE SEVERAL CRACKS ON THE DEVICE THAT CAUSED LEAKS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, AND NO ADVERSE EVENT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20925617 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 22, 2022Component Missing; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE RESPIRATORY AIDE FOUND THAT A PART FROM THE INLINE SUCTION SYSTEM WAS MISSING IN THE PACKAGE. THIS WAS NOTICED IMMEDIATELY UPON USE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15468982 ↗
  • InjuryJan 28, 2021Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THAT DURING SUCTIONING OF A COVID PATIENT, THE PORTEX CATHETERS SUCTION BROKE IN TWO PIECES. A REPLACEMENT OF THE VENTILATOR CIRCUIT AND MANUAL HAND VENTILATION IN MEANTIME WAS PERFORMED. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 11244257 ↗
  • InjuryOct 10, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THE INLINE SUCTION PORTION OF A SMITHS MEDICAL PORTEX SUCTION CATHETER SNAPPED AND BROKE WHILE IN USE WITH A PATIENT. THIS RESULTED IN A SMALL LACERATION ON THE CLINICIAN'S INDEX FINGER, AS WELL AS A HEART RATE INCREASE OF THE PATIENT TO 120S AND SAO2 DECREASE TO 59 PERCENT. THE PATENT WAS MANUALLY BAGGED UNTIL SAO2 INCREASED INTO THE 90S. ADDIITONALLY, THE RT CALLED FOR A NEW INLINE SUCTION PART. NO PATIENT INJURY RESULTED.

    Patient problems: Low Oxygen Saturation; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9176419 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 21, 2018Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THAT DURING SUCTIONING OF A PATIENT WITH A SMITHS MEDICAL PORTEX® SUCTIONPRO 72¿ THE BLUE PLASTIC THUMB CONTROL IS NOTED TO BE OCCLUDING THE SUCTION PORT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE BLUE PIECE OF THE SUCTION UNIT WAS PULLED FORWARD, IT HAD OCCLUDED THE SUCTION OUTLET. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8096758 ↗

Other CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL devices

All CATHETERS, SUCTION, TRACHEOBRONCHIAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page