Skip to content

Portex 100/899/070Recalls & reported problems

Icu Medical, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Portex (409)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 15019315060465), received between Nov 10, 2025 and Jan 15, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Disconnection” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Disconnection2
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 15, 2026Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD ISSUES WITH TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE WHERE CLIP DOESN¿T HOLD AND TUBE MIGRATES. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE A NEW TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE WAS INSERTED. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT BUT NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24078862 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 13, 2026Disconnection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE TRACHEOSTOMY EXCHANGE, THE TUBE CAME OUT. THERE WAS A PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24058943 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2025Disconnection; Disconnection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A TRACHEOSTOMY EXCHANGE ON (B)(6) 2025 WITH THE SAME TUBE TYPE, DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER. ON THE MORNING OF THE EVENT AT 9:30, THEY WERE NOTIFIED THAT THE TUBE HAD COME OUT. ON APPROACHING THE BED SPACE THE ANESTHETISTS TOLD THEM THAT WHEN HE ARRIVED THE CLIP WAS UNDONE. THEY TOOK OVER PATIENTS AIRWAY AND REINSERTED ANOTHER TUBE. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT BUT NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23513817 ↗

Other Tube, tracheostomy (w/wo connector) devices

All Tube, tracheostomy (w/wo connector) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page