Skip to content

Portex 100/899/070CZRecalls & reported problems

Icu Medical, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Portex (409)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 15019315107221), received between Mar 16, 2020 and Aug 1, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Defective Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 1, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAD A TRACHEOSTOMY PUT IN PLACE APPROXIMATELY OVER THREE (3) AND A HALF WEEKS AGO COUNTING FROM (B)(6) 2025. DUE TO THE CLIP FAILING A NEW ONE WAS PUT IN PLACE. THE CLIP HELD IN PLACE WITH NO ISSUES FOR A WEEK AND A HALF BUT THEN STARTED TO SLIP CAUSING THE TRACHEOSTOMY TO COME OUT OF PLACE. THE REPORTER STATED THEY NEEDED TO CHANGE THE TUBE AND INSERT A NEW ONE. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, AND NO ADVERSE HARM REPORTED. THE SECOND EVENT IS DOCUMENTED ON EMDR-72501

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22686608 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 1, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAD A TRACHEOSTOMY PUT IN PLACE APPROXIMATELY OVER THREE (3) AND A HALF WEEKS AGO COUNTING FROM (B)(6) 2025. DUE TO THE CLIP FAILING A NEW ONE WAS PUT IN PLACE. THE CLIP HELD IN PLACE WITH NO ISSUES FOR A WEEK AND A HALF BUT THEN STARTED TO SLIP CAUSING THE TRACHEOSTOMY TO COME OUT OF PLACE. THE REPORTER STATED THEY NEEDED TO CHANGE THE TUBE AND INSERT A NEW ONE. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, AND NO ADVERSE HARM REPORTED. THE SECOND EVENT IS DOCUMENTED ON EMDR-73306.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22686514 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 16, 2020Defective Component; Defective Component

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE BLUE LOCKSYSTEM ON A SMITHS MEDICAL REGARDING A PORTEX UNIPERC INNER CANNULA DID NOT WORK. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9833561 ↗

Other Tube, tracheostomy (w/wo connector) devices

All Tube, tracheostomy (w/wo connector) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page