Jelco 3265Recalls & reported problems
Icu Medical, Inc. · GTIN for VIAVALVE 18G X 1 1/4 Z 1EA · Class 2
All models of Jelco (101)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 15019517078411), received between Jun 5, 2018 and Jul 26, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (3 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K160235); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Advance3
- Positioning Failure3
- Break2
- Dull, Blunt2
- Connection Problem1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Disconnection1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- Infiltration into Tissue1
- Needle Stick/Puncture1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Pain1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 26, 2024Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER USE ON PATIENT, THE PARAMEDIC PUSHED THE SHIELDED VIAVALVE INTO THE SHARPS CONTAINER WHEN THE POINT OF THE NEEDLE BECAME UNSHIELDED AND STUCK THE PARAMEDIC. THIS OCCURRED A TOTAL OF 3 TIMES. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT CONTAMINATED NOR CONTAINED A BIOHAZARD OR CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENT. THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER WAS REPORTED HARMED DUE TO THE NEEDLESTICK. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THERAPY TO THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM/ADVERSE EVENT REPORTED.
Patient problems: Needle Stick/Puncture
MAUDE report 19838729 ↗MalfunctionAug 26, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS PLACED IN THE PATIENT AND THE TIP OF THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF IN THE CATHETER. THE NURSE REMOVED THE SYRINGE AND THE TIP OF THE NEEDLE FROM THE IV WAS ON THE TIP OF THE SYRINGE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15305161 ↗InjuryJan 6, 2021Break; Material Fragmentation; Break; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM A NURSE INSERTED 18G IV INTO PATIENT'S LEFT ANTECUBITAL FOSSA. IV INFILTRATED. LABS DRAWN OFF IT. WHILE TRYING TO REMOVE IV CATHETER, CATHETER GOT STUCK. MEDIC AT THE BEDSIDE STARTED TO PULL CATHETER OUT. PART OF CATHETER TIP APPEARS TO HAVE SHEARED OFF INTO THE VEIN. CATHETER MEASURED AND APPROXIMATELY 6MM OF CATHETER IS BELIEVED TO BE LEFT INSIDE OF PATIENTS ARM. SURGEON SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED APPROXIMATELY 0.3CM OF RETAINED CATHETER. NO COMPLICATIONS AND PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED THE NEXT DAY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 11127664 ↗InjurySep 18, 2018Disconnection; Connection Problem; Disconnection; Connection Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE OPERATOR TRIED TO REMOVE THE NEEDLE AND CATHETER, IT REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE PRODUCT WAS EVENTUALLY REMOVED. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED MINOR INJURY AS A RESULT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 7887208 ↗MalfunctionAug 14, 2018Product Quality Problem; Dull, Blunt; Product Quality Problem; Dull, Blunt
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STAFF WERE EXPERIENCING DIFFICULTY STARTING THE IVS. THE CATHETERS APPEARED DULL AND FAILED TO ADVANCE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENTS EXPERIENCED PAIN UPON INSERTION. NO FURTHER COMPLICATION WERE REPORTED, AND NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 7782570 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2018Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A USER FACILITY HAD DIFFICULTY STARTING AN IV DUE TO THE NEEDLE APPEARING DULL AND THE CATHETER NOT ADVANCING. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7643440 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2018Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A USER FACILITY HAD DIFFICULTY STARTING AN IV DUE TO THE NEEDLE APPEARING DULL AND THE CATHETER NOT ADVANCING. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7643421 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2018Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A USER FACILITY HAD DIFFICULTY STARTING AN IV DUE TO THE NEEDLE APPEARING DULL AND THE CATHETER NOT ADVANCING. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7643414 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2018Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Advance
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THAT THIS PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETER WAS DRAGGING UPON THREADING THE NEEDLE. THE DIFFICULT INSERTION CAUSED VEINS TO BLOW AND REQUIRED ADDITIONAL POKES. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7579589 ↗MalfunctionJun 5, 2018Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NURSE EXPERIENCED A DRAG WHEN TREADING THE CATHETER FORWARD, CAUSING THE VEIN TO BLOW AND NEEDING TO POKE THE PATIENT AGAIN. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7570849 ↗MalfunctionJun 5, 2018Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NURSES WERE COMPLAINING OF A DRAG WHEN THREADING THE CATHETER FORWARD. THEY ALLEGED THAT THIS EITHER CAUSED THE VEINS TO BLOW, OR REQUIRED HAVING TO POKE THE PATIENT AGAIN. NO DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY WAS REPORTED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: Infiltration into Tissue
MAUDE report 7570847 ↗MalfunctionJun 5, 2018Dull, Blunt; Dull, Blunt
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE VIAVALVE CATHETER UTILIZED BY THE RN'S ARE COMPLAINING OF A DRAG WHEN THREADING THE CATHETER FORWARD. CAUSING VEINS TO BLOW OR HAVING TO POKE THE PATIENT AGAIN.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7570835 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K160235. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1218-2019 · Aug 22, 2018 · TerminatedJelco(R) ViaValve(TM) safety intravenous (I.V.) catheters, 18G x 1 1/4", Model Number REF 3265, MOD 10 The Jelco(R) ViaValve(TM) safety I.V. catheter is a sterile, non pyrogeni
Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days devices
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382523Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days660 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382533Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls527 reports
- BD PosiFlush 306546Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 death608 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard Shielded IV Catheter 381823Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, short-term less than 30 days582 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 381423Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 recall528 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382544Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 recall437 reports
- BD Nexiva, BD Q-Syte 383536Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls374 reports
- BD PosiFlush 306547Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls1 death331 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page