Skip to content

Smart Port CT H787CT75STSDVI1Recalls & reported problems

Angiodynamics, Inc. · Smart Port CT Single Titanium Port System with Attachable 7.5F x 66cm Silicone Catheter and 8F Introducer Kit (with Valved Introducer) · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Smart Port CT (36)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 15051684018135), received between Jun 9, 2025 and Jan 19, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K062414); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2

Patient problems

  • Medical device site infection2
  • Bacteremia1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Pain1
  • Purulent Discharge1
  • Swelling/ Edema1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 19, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2021, PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT PLACEMENT OF AN ANGIODYNAMICS SMARTPORT PORT CATHETER PRODUCT, WITH MODEL NUMBER CT75STSD-VI, AND LOT NUMBER 5666879. THIS SMARTPORT DEVICE WAS COMPRISED OF A PORT BODY AND A SILICONE CATHETER. THE SMARTPORT DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED BY DR. (B)(6)., M.D., AT (B)(6), AND THE PURPOSE OF IMPLANTATION OF THE SMARTPORT WAS TO TREAT PLAINTIFF'S SICKLE CELL DISEASE. DEFENDANTS, DIRECTLY OR THROUGH THEIR AGENTS, APPARENT AGENTS, SERVANTS, OR EMPLOYEES DESIGNED, MANUFACTURED, MARKETED, ADVERTISED, DISTRIBUTED, AND SOLD THE SMARTPORT THAT WAS IMPLANTED IN PLAINTIFF. DEFENDANTS MANUFACTURED, SOLD, AND/OR DISTRIBUTED THE SMARTPORT TO PLAINTIFF, THROUGH PLAINTIFF'S DOCTORS, TO BE USED FOR VEIN ACCESS. ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2022, PLAINTIFF PRESENTED TO (B)(6), WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN AND SWELLING NEAR HER PORT SITE. BLOOD CULTURES WERE DRAWN AND CAME BACK POSITIVE FOR AN INFECTION, REQUIRING REMOVAL OF THE SMARTPORT. ON (B)(6) 2022, PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT REMOVAL OF THE SMARTPORT, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED BY DR. (B)(6), M.D., AT (B)(6). DURING THE REMOVAL PROCEDURE ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2022, DR. (B)(6) NOTED THAT PURULENT FLUID WAS EXPRESSED FROM THE PORT P

    Patient problems: Bacteremia; Medical device site infection; Pain; Purulent Discharge; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 24109516 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 2, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    A NURSE REPORTED THE FOLLOWING ISSUE WITH A CT W/7.5FR DET CATH & VI SMARTPORT: "PATIENT HAD AN ANGIODYNAMICS PORT PLACED BY DR. (B)(6) ON (B)(6). PATIENT ARRIVED AT THE CANCER INSTITUTE ON (B)(6). PORT WAS ACCESSED AND NO BLOOD RETURN NOTED. CATH FLO WAS PLACED AND UNSUCCESSFUL. MD NOTIFIED AND PORTOGRAM WAS ORDERED. COMPLETED ON (B)(6) AND IT SHOWED: DISCONTINUITY OF THE PATIENT'S CENTRAL CATHETER WHICH APPEARS TO HAVE SHEARED AT THE LEVEL OF THE CHEST WALL. THE LOOSE FRAGMENT OF THE CATHETER IS LARGELY WITHIN THE RIGHT ATRIUM. PATIENT WAS THEN SENT TO THE ER AND WAS TRANSFERRED TO GMH TO HAVE THE DEVICE REMOVED FROM RIGHT ATRIUM." DESPITE MULTIPLE GOOD FAITH EFFORT ATTEMPTS, NO FURTHER DETAILS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23692422 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2015, (B)(6). UNDERWENT PLACEMENT OF AN ANGIODYNAMICS' SMARTPORT CT DEVICE, CATALOG # CT75STSD-VI, LOT # 4792614. UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF, THE DEVICE'S DESCRIPTION IS AS FOLLOWS: SMARTPORT CT SINGLE TITANIUM PORT SYSTEM WITH ATTACHABLE 7.5F X 66CM SILICONE CATHETER AND 8F INTRODUCER KIT (WITH VALVED INTRODUCER). THE DEVICE AT ISSUE WAS IMPLANTED BY DR. (B)(6), M.D., (B)(6) HOSPITAL, IN (B)(6), FOR THE TREATMENT OF PLAINTIFF'S MEDICAL CONDITION. ON (B)(6) 2015, (B)(6). PRESENTED TO (B)(6) HOSPITAL IN (B)(6). AT THAT TIME, (B)(6) MEDICAL TEAM DETERMINED THAT HER SMARTPORT CT WAS INFECTED AND THAT THE INFECTED PORT-A-CATH HAD TO BE REMOVED. ON (B)(6) 2015, (B)(6) DEFECTIVE PORT WAS REMOVED BY DR. (B)(6), MD, AT (B)(6) HOSPITAL, IN (B)(6). ON (B)(6) 2015, THE POST-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS REVEALED THAT (B)(6).'S PORT-A-CATH AT ISSUE WAS INFECTED. AFTER REMOVAL OF THE INFECTED SMARTPORT CT PORT-A-CATH, PLAINTIFF DID NOT HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH DR. (B)(6), M.D. ABOUT THE CAUSES OF HER CATHETER INFECTION AND HER POST-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF THE INFECTED PORT-A-CATH. PLAINTIFF KNEW SHE HAD AN INFECTION, BUT SHE DID NOT KNOW HER INFECTION WAS CAUSED BY THE SMARTPORT CT'S

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 23048097 ↗
  • InjuryJun 9, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AN END USER REPORTED AN ISSUE WITH A CT W/7.5FR DET CATH & VI SMARTPORT. DURING A PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE SILICONE CATHETER BROKE OFF AND WENT INTO THE PATIENT'S VEIN. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO (B)(6) BY MEDICAL HELICOPTER, AND THE FRAGMENT WAS REMOVED BY INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY ON THE SAME DAY. THE DEVICE HAD BEEN INSPECTED PRIOR TO INSERTION IN THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER DETAILS COULD BE PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22172704 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K062414. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1466-2021 · Feb 22, 2021 · Terminated
    Smart Port CT-Implantable Port Catalogue #: CT96STSD-VI, CT96STSA-VI - Product Usage: indicated for any patient requiring repeated access of the vascular system, for delivery of me
  • Z-0056-2012 · Aug 1, 2011 · Terminated
    8F Smart Port CT, Catalog number: CT80STPD and CT80STPD-NF; AngioDynamics, INC. The Smart Port CT Implantable Port is a Single Titanium Port System with Attachable 8.0 Fr. Polyur

Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices

All PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page