Skip to content

CETRA 19-6516Recalls & reported problems

Orthofix US LLC · 4.0mm X 16mm PRIMARY SEMI-CONSTRAINED SELF-DRILLING SCREW · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 18257200134946), received between Sep 18, 2024 and Sep 18, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 18, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WENT IN FOR A 6 WEEK FOLLOW UP. PATIENT HARDWARE WAS INTACT. AT 4 MONTHS A LOCKING MECHANISM FAILED. TWO INFERIOR SCREWS AND FAILED LOCKING MECHANISM WERE REMOVED AND DISCARDED PER BANNER HOSPITAL POLICY. DEVICE NOT RETURNING. A REVISION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. NO KNOWN NON-UNION. NO ISSUES INTRAOPERATIVELY. PATIENT HAD NO FALL OR ANY ACCUTE INJURY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20250824 ↗
  • InjurySep 18, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WENT IN FOR A 6 WEEK FOLLOW UP. PATIENT HARDWARE WAS INTACT. AT 4 MONTHS A LOCKING MECHANISM FAILED. TWO INFERIOR SCREWS AND FAILED LOCKING MECHANISM WERE REMOVED AND DISCARDED PER BANNER HOSPITAL POLICY. DEVICE NOT RETURNING. A REVISION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6)2024. NO KNOWN NON-UNION. NO ISSUES INTRAOPERATIVELY. PATIENT HAD NO FALL OR ANY ACCUTE INJURY. REV. 1 CORRECT COMPONENT CODE TO 568 SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20249342 ↗

Other Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body devices

All Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page