Skip to content

MozecTM NC Rx PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter MNC45013Recalls & reported problems

Meril Life Sciences Private Limited · MozecTM NC Rx PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter, 4.50 mm x 13 mm, Rapid Exchange · Class 2

All models of MozecTM NC Rx PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 18906029359527), received between Oct 21, 2023 and Oct 21, 2023 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deflation Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Deflation Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 21, 2023Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem

    AS REPORTED, 4.50X13 MM MOZEC¿ NC RX PTCA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED FOR THE PROCEDURE. THE TARGET LESION WAS MID RCA WITH SEVERE TORTUOSITY, 80% CALCIFICATION AND 80% STENOSIS. THE BALLOON WAS PLACED MID TO PROXIMAL IN THE RCA. THE BALLOON DID NOT DEFLATE DURING THE PROCEDURE. (THE BALLON TOOK 1.5 - 2 MINUTES TO DEFLATE). THE DEVICE WAS USED IN 62 YEARS OLD MALE PATIENT. THE TARGET LESION WAS MID RCA WITH SEVERE TORTUOSITY, 80% CALCIFICATION AND 80% STENOSIS. THE DEVICE WAS STORED AND HANDLED PER THE IFU. THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES NOTED TO THE DEVICE WHEN IT WAS TAKEN OUT OF THE PACKAGING. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY IN REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE HOOP. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY IN REMOVING THE STYLET. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED NORMALLY. THERE WAS NO ANOMALY NOTED DURING OR AFTER THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED. THE PRODUCT WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE AND APPEARED TO BE NORMAL. THERE WAS NO UNUSUAL FORCE USED DURING THE LOADING ON GUIDEWIRE. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE/FRICTION EXPERIENCED WHILE INSERTING THE DEVICE THROUGH THE ROTATING HEMOSTATIC VALVE. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE/FRICTION EXPERIENCED WHILE INSERTING THE DEVICE THROUGH THE GUIDE CATHETER. THERE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17981741 ↗

Other Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices

All Catheters, Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page