MEDLINE NEUROSPNG05Recalls & reported problems
Medline Industries, Inc. · SPONGE,NEURO,0.5"X0.5",XR,STRL,10/PK · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20080196286659), received between Oct 30, 2025 and Jun 15, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Mar 19, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified
During an internal review, Medline identified higher-than-expected endotoxin levels on a representative Medline neuro sponge product, indicating that in-market product may be out-of-specification for endotoxin.
Z-2008-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Contamination1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient3
- Erythema1
- Fluid Discharge1
- Impaired Healing1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Wound Dehiscence1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Contamination
IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A 'LEFT LUMBAR 4-LUMBAR 5 MICRODISCECTOMY" ON (B)(6) 2026 WHERE THE NEUROSPONGES WERE USED THE " PATIENT CONTINUES TO HEALING ISSUES. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED "PERSISTANT DRAINAGE , FLUID COLLECTION SUBCONSCIOUSLY AND WOUND OPEN BACK UP" AS WELL AS ERTHIMA ALONG INCISION SITE ".
Patient problems: Erythema; Fluid Discharge; Impaired Healing; Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 25510241 ↗MalfunctionFeb 16, 2026Material Integrity Problem
COTTONOID DETACHED FROM STRING DURING SURGERY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24344979 ↗InjuryJan 13, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn
ACCORDING TO THE CUSTOMER, (B)(6) 2025 IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE STRING WAS MISSING FROM A COTTONOID SPONGE WHILE REMOVING IT FROM THE SURGICAL SITE. THE CUSTOMER SAID "THE STRING HAD BEEN SUCTIONED INTO THE NEPTUNE MACHINE" AND WAS RECOVERED FROM THE NEPTUNE MANIFOLD. THE CUSTOMER CONFIRMED THAT ALL PIECES OF THE COTTONOID WERE RECOVERED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS ABLE TO BE COMPLETED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24053260 ↗MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component
WHILE REMOVING A 1/2 X 1/2 COTTONOID SPONGE FROM THE SURGICAL SITE, THE SCRUB TECH DISCOVERED THE STRING WAS MISSING FROM THE COTTONOID SPONGE. THE SURGICAL TEAM WAS IMMEDIATELY INFORMED. THE SURGICAL AREA WAS INSPECTED, AS WAS THE SURROUNDING AREA. SUSPECTING THE STRING HAD BEEN SUCTIONED INTO THE NEPTUNE MACHINE, THE SUCTION MANIFOLD WAS REMOVED FROM THE MACHINE. THE SUCTION MANIFOLD FILTER HAD CAUGHT THE STRING, AND THE STRING WAS THEN REMOVED FROM THE FILTER. VISUAL CONFIRMATION OF THE STRING WAS COMPLETED BY CIRCULATOR, CTL [CARE TEAM LEADER], AND FELLOW. SURGEON INFORMED. THE PATTY AND STRING WERE OBTAINED, PLACED IN A BIOHAZARD BAG, AND TAKEN TO THE FRONT DESK.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23815609 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
DURING A SPINAL PROCEDURE, A COTTONOID PATTY DETACHED FROM ITS STRING AND MIGRATED INTO THE DURAL SPACE, TRACKING UPWARD APPROXIMATELY TWO SPINAL LEVELS. THIS CAUSED AN INTRAOPERATIVE DELAY OF 1-2 HOURS DUE TO A SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL EFFORT. THE SPONGE WAS LOCATED USING INTRAOPERATIVE O-ARM 3D IMAGING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, BUT REQUIRED EXTENDED ANESTHESIA TIME, INCREASED SURGICAL SITE SIZE, AND ADDITIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE, ALONG WITH AN OVERNIGHT HOSPITAL STAY INSTEAD OF SAME-DAY DISCHARGE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23433246 ↗
Other Neurosurgical paddie devices
- CODMAN® 801400Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · Neurosurgical paddie2 recalls9 reports
- CODMAN® 801407Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · Neurosurgical paddie1 recall6 reports
- CODMAN® 801451Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · Neurosurgical paddie1 recall5 reports
- CODMAN® 801404Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · Neurosurgical paddie1 recall4 reports
- CODMAN® 801408Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · Neurosurgical paddie1 recall2 reports
- CODMAN® 801406Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · Neurosurgical paddie1 recall2 reports
- CODMAN® 801403Integra Lifesciences Production Corporation · Neurosurgical paddie1 recall2 reports
- CODMAN 80-1407Cerenovus, Inc. · NEUROSURGICAL PADDIE1 recall2 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page